IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authentication Method Reference Values

William Denniss <wdenniss@google.com> Thu, 03 March 2016 01:03 UTC

Return-Path: <wdenniss@google.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D631B1B3737 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:03:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7kF9E6u6dEKm for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:03:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 747F21B3735 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:03:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id ts10so6491918obc.1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 17:03:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0CJdTupibF85TLn7CmystHR2WoxN1diwV2A/aCwKH3g=; b=kf7+5GG/dX+WJbGUC8hPs39VdBMKknEzSa0iaC+hG1zcY89O6aLNxEi+VpYiLuLq0p ooFeNNFC9f6MdP9pQVlVQK1+1I4mrLjXBfz3JHsvH0fvcg5/MsTnXZikkdRAIZhF31X2 1spaNv1Z15ZD5yBA3NapGztiIMNV4SFMvGdgbHKjX9tg97I1uYrKFtj+qRtSibmI2+C8 sXFhsHWM5h8QM7uwv1Wn75NIlj+vgrns6eYZa3yyKum1LmerocdCLLETMmnfV/j72fng p4pV6wLvXVu8NZPntSwjsZVwITgB0vPVtZ1385Vhp29guhwlCxD1H1YgethcjamB322P c26A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=0CJdTupibF85TLn7CmystHR2WoxN1diwV2A/aCwKH3g=; b=iMcjZP2tNxU0jaOO/L4x7sA8djdHQDFpMOlNN/V8A13ky+VVNnUxAPZuRRQ2SzMIEE JaydzB0yeqUzTi8MGeo9m4Vpl3OPSQjD8cXlKaRIXDj6Vaz535yigF3773Ub8sN2MfHu U7OnQFVDPGPtBkBPsEp0SNBnGTyXl80oYlL/HX69AXoSt90r/yDmWl1HEIZxH3Tbu90R sIOp7AriWgITpk2uIXY18Gm9oX+Alutnv7DHGqeJpvhBOI4NKEl+LD9LRgKPwOjDFtv1 5An4ZqCgAEKKD4AWtWCaZ6gkykPEKvySc3LkY84pV7auhJ774jdw4HL8gSJXTKiFf+bp a6kQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLJUEh45vqZfe2ehNODDiYOOiyXOWVnXsbQXuSb61ASKe/U6txcW8OLXzo5Kg06QznkwPGbDqlTE3XPhBph
X-Received: by 10.182.114.167 with SMTP id jh7mr23559900obb.70.1456967037685; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 17:03:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BY2PR03MB4424F115D8B6624849934D6F5BD0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY2PR03MB4424F115D8B6624849934D6F5BD0@BY2PR03MB442.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: William Denniss <wdenniss@google.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 01:03:46 +0000
Message-ID: <CAAP42hB5nhF7JOaQ9kdcvd1209XSfJxXGSFtooKLm0hHy4BmnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c2e2e6bb5cf6052d1a9278"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/leE1kf-dv_YTZhpiOW7_G9UsEI0>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authentication Method Reference Values
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 01:04:00 -0000

I support adoption of this specification by the working group.

We are already using some values in production and I see interoperability
advantages in having these standardized.

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:42 PM Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> I support adoption of this specification by the working group.  Aspects of
> it are already being used in production by Google and Microsoft.  It is
> also normatively referenced by the mobile profile for OpenID Connect being
> produced by the OpenID MODRNA working group.
>
>                                         -- Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 5:09 AM
> To: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authentication Method Reference
> Values
>
> In response to my message to the list regarding the initial call for
> adoption of the Authentication Method Reference Values draft, see
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15694.html, Mike
> submitted an updated version of the document to take raised concerns into
> account. Several working group participants responded positively to the new
> version.
>
> We would therefore like to issue a 2nd call for adoption of the recently
> submitted version -05:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-05
>
> Please let us know by March 3rd whether you accept / object to the
> adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth working
> group.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes & Derek
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email