Re: [OAUTH-WG] broken links in draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-11

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Sun, 19 July 2015 12:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1717B1ACD71 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 05:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W7MiCUCBc0q5 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 05:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 801D81ACDB4 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 05:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicgb10 with SMTP id gb10so5795498wic.1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 05:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=jm+uUBK1gQU+q/L8xpSk+i/kA4RCMSLfCrSDcx8M6I8=; b=AHkJ7kbYQYW0PLtacCtnTJbGfFvZXsotqh5PffATgyDC9NikenGmIrjkRXeMnbJHXk ET1D/Mahg0Hm5F7d9X1nvx4UWc0BHFKEvujzUDNgVf9BBtP4HpFXI0mBkUDFh3Y+7MA3 Kbln2QJnT2cyyyHFLmZnDTgGu6RvTRlN9Qg/V89wwIkcmIBvayLLbd8Ek94nik041Luf keB6nY2BuEiWty8K+T9LY2CZgajKcpQQyfORJIfW8j517zq2Iyu7hSsXon5Nl0qx68RP FFbpcpp06QnXSy26ZcbX4t9qUDcB4CcfoiIpYs854/g8y2CvQRx0yy2Y0UShZe8v60Dm x1UQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmgLZQmI3KD0r11j5WWQREObHKNX4l5mH5+m4eNv3U3lxMbq4GyaOjYMACw762SYtSYQy3z
X-Received: by 10.194.85.116 with SMTP id g20mr45913421wjz.154.1437307781968; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 05:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.6.0.171] ([62.212.85.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id di7sm6731035wib.23.2015.07.19.05.09.40 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 19 Jul 2015 05:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DEB72135-21F8-40F3-9965-2CF4784BE17D"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <AAD0E675-F885-4ACE-8438-3AD045364A33@mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 14:09:38 +0200
Message-Id: <D9FBA222-6ECA-4261-A42F-A902775D9E4B@ve7jtb.com>
References: <CAGBSGjprEOdZ4yXMuQ8ofEmNHy4X4bhjH_z7k3eUVZzBTSZR6Q@mail.gmail.com> <AAD0E675-F885-4ACE-8438-3AD045364A33@mit.edu>
To: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/YtladamOaAT66YphKxcdzfWNxvk>
Cc: "<oauth@ietf.org>" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] broken links in draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-11
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:10:10 -0000

Remember tools is not using the XML to render the HTML directly, it is marking up the text version.   This bites me all the time as well.

The text version needs to render to “Section 3.3 of RFC 6749” to get Rfcmarkup tool <http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcmarkup/index> to render it correctly.   

The trailing of OAuth 2.0 messes up Rfcmarkup.

I am looking at fixing PIXE for the RFC editor so this happens to be a current issue for me, as I did the same thing because that is what produces the best HTML output from XML2RFC.

What I have learned is to NOT format looking at the html output from XML2RFC as it leads you in the wrong direction,  output as text then run through Rfcmarkup to see what the version on the document tracker will look like.

Hope this saves you some time.

John B.


> On Jul 19, 2015, at 7:05 AM, Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> Thanks, those are artifacts in the rendered XML, I’ll look into fixing them.
> 
>  — Justin
> 
>> On Jul 19, 2015, at 3:24 AM, Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com <mailto:aaron@parecki.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> In section 2.2, https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-11#section-2.2 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-introspection-11#section-2.2> the "scope" description references section 3.3 of RFC6749, but the hyperlink contains just the fragment #section-3.3 which then points to the current page. The same problem exists with the "token_type" parameter. Additionally, I believe the token type link should point to section 7.1 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-7.1 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-7.1>) which is where token types are defined. Thanks!
>> 
>> ----
>> Aaron Parecki
>> aaronparecki.com <http://aaronparecki.com/>
>> @aaronpk <http://twitter.com/aaronpk>
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth