[OAUTH-WG] Better title for OAuth 2.0 JWT Authorization Request
"Nat Sakimura" <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp> Fri, 09 October 2015 01:43 UTC
Return-Path: <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312B51B302A for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.609
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5bbrilbdiwEx for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:43:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nrifs02.index.or.jp (nrigw01.index.or.jp [133.250.250.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2021B3024 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nriea05.index.or.jp (unknown [172.19.246.40]) by nrifs02.index.or.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BE651968A5 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:43:17 +0900 (JST)
Received: from nrims00b.nri.co.jp ([192.50.135.12]) by nriea05.index.or.jp (unknown) with ESMTP id t991hGSu013905 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:43:16 +0900
Received: from nrims00b.nri.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nrims00b.nri.co.jp (Switch-3.3.4/Switch-3.3.4) with ESMTP id t991hGFZ006788; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:43:16 +0900
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by nrims00b.nri.co.jp (Switch-3.3.4/Switch-3.3.0/Submit) id t991hGcc006787; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:43:16 +0900
X-Authentication-Warning: nrims00b.nri.co.jp: mailnull set sender to n-sakimura@nri.co.jp using -f
Received: from nrizmf12.index.or.jp ([172.100.25.21]) by nrims00b.nri.co.jp (Switch-3.3.4/Switch-3.3.4) with ESMTP id t991hGIk006784 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:43:16 +0900
From: Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura@nri.co.jp>
To: 'oauth' <oauth@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 10:43:17 +0900
Message-ID: <00c001d10233$debc8720$9c359560$@nri.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C1_01D1027F.4EA5B5C0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
thread-index: AdECM7x7AzuBoRigTh+o3OQfhMlNVg==
Content-Language: ja
X-MailAdviser: 20150401
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/adwWQoOFD74uOO5cZpKKBBcstcI>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Better title for OAuth 2.0 JWT Authorization Request
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 01:43:20 -0000
Hi OAuthers: One of the to do for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-05 is to come up with a better title. The current title "OAuth 2.0 JWT Authorization Request (JAR)", is somewhat better than what it used to be, but if you can suggest a better name, I am all for it. Please let me know if you have an idea. Best, -- Nat Sakimura < <mailto:n-sakimura@nri.co.jp> n-sakimura@nri.co.jp> Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. PLEASE READ: The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete your copy from your system.
- [OAUTH-WG] Better title for OAuth 2.0 JWT Authori… Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Better title for OAuth 2.0 JWT Aut… Jim Manico
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Better title for OAuth 2.0 JWT Aut… Axel.Nennker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Better title for OAuth 2.0 JWT Aut… Axel.Nennker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Better title for OAuth 2.0 JWT Aut… Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Better title for OAuth 2.0 JWT Aut… Jim Manico
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Better title for OAuth 2.0 JWT Aut… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Better title for OAuth 2.0 JWT Aut… Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Better title for OAuth 2.0 JWT Aut… Jim Manico