Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-jones-appsawg-webfinger-04

Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com> Fri, 04 May 2012 19:41 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C554621E8043; Fri, 4 May 2012 12:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.529
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.529 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.069, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nDE94eK6lauo; Fri, 4 May 2012 12:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex2out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex2out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [184.168.131.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C5621E8042; Fri, 4 May 2012 12:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P3PWEX2HT003.ex2.secureserver.net ([184.168.131.11]) by p3plex2out02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id 5vhQ1j0030EuLVk01vhQLu; Fri, 04 May 2012 12:41:24 -0700
Received: from P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net ([169.254.8.88]) by P3PWEX2HT003.ex2.secureserver.net ([184.168.131.11]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 4 May 2012 12:41:23 -0700
From: Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>, "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-jones-appsawg-webfinger-04
Thread-Index: Ac0qG8eE3EKALRWtQ/iIIohy4m6GpQAEgy3Q
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 19:41:23 +0000
Message-ID: <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA20101CA96@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net>
References: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392810E4CA@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <9452079D1A51524AA5749AD23E00392810E4CA@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [64.74.213.174]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA20101CA96P3PWEX2MB008ex2_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-jones-appsawg-webfinger-04
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 19:41:25 -0000

I support using this document as the starting point for this work.

EH

From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Murray S. Kucherawy
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 10:32 AM
To: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] draft-jones-appsawg-webfinger-04

The above-named draft has been offered as the recommended path forward in terms of converging on a single document to advance through appsawg.  The conversation I saw this week in that regard has seemed mostly positive.

Please review it, or at least the diff, and indicate your support or objection on apps-discuss@ietf.org<mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org> to adopting this one as the common path forward. We would like to make a decision about which one to begin advancing in the next week or two.

Have a good weekend!

-MSK, APPSAWG co-chair