Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-pop-key-distribution-01 and Open Issues

Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> Thu, 05 March 2015 12:59 UTC

Return-Path: <jricher@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015261A0318 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 04:59:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U1X5eTbaTgI5 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 04:59:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu [18.9.25.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A73CF1A01A9 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 04:59:38 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 1209190f-f79546d000007593-3f-54f8533952e0
Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 1C.E8.30099.93358F45; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:59:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id t25Cxak9021991; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:59:37 -0500
Received: from [192.168.128.57] (static-96-237-195-53.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [96.237.195.53]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jricher@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id t25CxYIJ030699 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:59:35 -0500
Message-ID: <54F8532F.7000501@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 07:59:27 -0500
From: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
References: <54F81ADA.3000203@gmx.net> <0B09DB9C-CB26-448D-AE4B-F50E37C2560A@ve7jtb.com> <54F83F32.3040305@gmx.net> <FE8540FB-5CF6-4B1F-9C07-21638865AB17@ve7jtb.com> <54F84F69.2090408@gmx.net> <A49503FE-3634-4859-9180-B7589259515D@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <A49503FE-3634-4859-9180-B7589259515D@ve7jtb.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpmleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRYrdT0bUM/hFisOCyrMXSnfdYLU6+fcVm sfruXzYHZo/Fm/azeSxZ8pPJ4/btjSwBzFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGUsu/GQu2M5VMXnpJ+YG xlkcXYycHBICJhLH1k5nhrDFJC7cW8/WxcjFISSwmEli1u47LCAJIYENjBLX1tZAJG4xScw4 cokRJMEroCYx59FqMJtFQFVi874esElsQPb0NS1MILaoQJREz59uNoh6QYmTM5+ADRURiJFY en8GO4jNDFS/fvVFsHphgSCJHZt2skMs+8QoMXvaFbAFnAJ2Est+LGSFaLCVuDN3NzOELS+x /e0c5gmMgrOQ7JiFpGwWkrIFjMyrGGVTcqt0cxMzc4pTk3WLkxPz8lKLdE30cjNL9FJTSjcx gsKaU5J/B+O3g0qHGAU4GJV4eD9s/h4ixJpYVlyZe4hRkoNJSZQ32PhHiBBfUn5KZUZicUZ8 UWlOavEhRgkOZiUR3nwtoBxvSmJlVWpRPkxKmoNFSZx30w++ECGB9MSS1OzU1ILUIpisDAeH kgSvaBBQo2BRanpqRVpmTglCmomDE2Q4D9BwRZAa3uKCxNzizHSI/ClGRSlx3v+BQAkBkERG aR5cLyztvGIUB3pFmHcxSDsPMGXBdb8CGswENFhLDGxwSSJCSqqBMbNkiWHHYtXcQxeTYjaV 3twr9eFiK3/N9AmGd3vdxIwZo7p8o5MmLZv4W8fKKe5pgKDZhEfb7/N/2CteFZGk/kHbVFHD afmVR3EqWxzXRNZyn2M/dmpaxr08I/0TjHdDSuuWyG3lWiXHMXfBuuR/f2W9H/pe+/El7ulk kQ9GM1zPei5dNkVBTomlOCPRUIu5qDgRAFJR41IWAwAA
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/m0f_4M00-_v1fgF_JEOVPpewJQ4>
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-pop-key-distribution-01 and Open Issues
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:59:41 -0000

Right, but do we need to say that in Dyn-Reg? That's really more of a 
problem for the protocol using the keys, not the one registering it for use.

  -- Justin

On 3/5/2015 7:58 AM, John Bradley wrote:
> I am ok with saying that the JWK must have keyed if there is more than one key and it SHOULD if there is only one.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:43 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> that's a good idea. However, the dynamic client registration should
>> state that the "kid" parameter is used and must be included in the JWK
>> (since the kid is an optional parameter).
>>
>> The key name is then the 'kid' plus the client id since the value of the
>> kid is not unique by itself.
>>
>> Ciao
>> Hannes
>>
>>> On 03/05/2015 12:54 PM, John Bradley wrote:
>>> For signing authentication requests you include the keyid in the JWT, and the AS looks in the JWKS to find the correct key if there is more than one.
>>>
>>> I don't think that is a problem
>>>
>>> What we probably need to do is pass a keyid in the request if there is more than one signing key registered for the client.
>>>
>>> John B.
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth