IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OAUTH-WG] Errata 3904

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 08 December 2015 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE871B2F4A for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:47:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fMHBU9UycYa9 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:47:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3072C1B2F45 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:47:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so34938487wmw.0 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 07:47:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aMy3KfHNfIszYb+j0A/dxRN4fDQAEI1Y/6NLYcoe+N4=; b=B0tQTkxFbHhFp2o9MMuPs02YCr0NRhiGarQPR2x4QE1pjGvaYV6WdHLh4PQWKCWlfu NV/3WRxo4q5zcLny7IMt0A/Va1NOVghbEB1UeM/NquIMdjmpJU2vSeL6Kb0vPHUKBO4q fAQ/oAAJ+Hb/mwsS+T2pqkbyIhs0bgrAOAEGcFRSEA3dYaPDsZ9P6Einq05XpqmwCy01 0KTbo5ZDIeeYHUnbpTsJkYuUQXL7/EX1rbqV4RVuHg7MW2KlqKJSuILTlGMU4rM8dudk IwyCOoEmMYICp9LhfjQ49N2NCCYkoHbQpaf0NQW+ziYXs4IbDrylF+6lGVlhq8xmsb2p hehQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.179.162 with SMTP id dh2mr215373wjc.17.1449589632732; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 07:47:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.28.52.130 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 07:47:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:47:12 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH6P3t_zo3CT-q-Lm3bOffW0_2kTtFvOmKc-W8VFiWDa6Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/sM97rEgbbRxkOcU4zICatb3iLXo>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Errata 3904
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 15:47:15 -0000

Hi,

I'm inclined to reject the following errata on 2 counts:

error_description is already included int he registry and adding a new
entry involves a 'specification required' and a review period on the
email list for that registry.

Should there be a specification for this?  It looks the same as
error_description to me, but maybe I'm missing something?

Errata description:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg12519.html

Section of OAuth 2.0 referenced:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-11.2.2

-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email