IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ogpx] LLIDL, LLSD, Transport

David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com> Mon, 15 February 2010 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <dwl@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A8928C20D; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:11:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13tlYgk9z3KK; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:11:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com (e5.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.145]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6F228C209; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:11:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (d01relay01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.233]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o1FHxGjg028561; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:59:16 -0500
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o1FICdKx116598; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:12:39 -0500
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o1FICcAM030528; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:12:38 -0500
Received: from d01ml605.pok.ibm.com (d01ml605.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.91]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id o1FICcfa030525; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:12:38 -0500
To: ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>, ogpx-bounces@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 9C5B1597:47D03774-852576CB:006382E5; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0.2 HF623 January 16, 2009
Message-ID: <OF9C5B1597.47D03774-ON852576CB.006382E5-852576CB.006409C6@us.ibm.com>
From: David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:12:38 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML605/01/M/IBM(Release 8.5.1HF41 | October 22, 2009) at 02/15/2010 13:12:38, Serialize complete at 02/15/2010 13:12:38
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 006409C4852576CB_="
Subject: [ogpx] LLIDL, LLSD, Transport
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:11:21 -0000

I've taken a quick read over 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamrick-vwrap-type-system-00 
and unless I'm misreading the draft, it binds exclusively onto http(s) as 
transport. Given  all the
work in hybi and websocket in adjacent working groups in the applications 
area of IETF, this
seems... problematic  Comments?

- David 
~ Zha

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email