Re: [ogpx] LLIDL, LLSD, Transport

Lawson English <lenglish5@cox.net> Mon, 15 February 2010 20:45 UTC

Return-Path: <lenglish5@cox.net>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273C628C0F9; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:45:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OXAT01C0SzKv; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:45:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (fed1rmmtao101.cox.net [68.230.241.45]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4853D3A7BDA; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:45:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fed1rmimpo03.cox.net ([70.169.32.75]) by fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20100215204705.XRCX4995.fed1rmmtao101.cox.net@fed1rmimpo03.cox.net>; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:47:05 -0500
Received: from ip72-200-121-127.tc.ph.cox.net ([72.200.121.127]) by fed1rmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id iLn51d00E2l1Ksg04Ln5sG; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:47:05 -0500
X-VR-Score: -80.00
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=3OYv9oSQMPl2mzQJct9Z0gr0/14v7p3aTRAVsPGESI0= c=1 sm=1 a=Wajolswj7cQA:10 a=lHHFyFaL52RzbKbxZIYZqA==:17 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=L_uOGFTYJhrA-OFA2BoA:9 a=XX1nP2nVRzSQ9TnXTSl1ZuLszZUA:4 a=lHHFyFaL52RzbKbxZIYZqA==:117
X-CM-Score: 0.00
Message-ID: <4B79B2C9.8020800@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:47:05 -0700
From: Lawson English <lenglish5@cox.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com>
References: <OF9C5B1597.47D03774-ON852576CB.006382E5-852576CB.006409C6@us.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF9C5B1597.47D03774-ON852576CB.006382E5-852576CB.006409C6@us.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ogpx-bounces@ietf.org, ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ogpx] LLIDL, LLSD, Transport
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lenglish5@cox.net
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:45:35 -0000

David W Levine wrote:
>
> I've taken a quick read over 
> _http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hamrick-vwrap-type-system-00_
> and unless I'm misreading the draft, it binds exclusively onto http(s) 
> as transport. Given  all the
> work in hybi and websocket in adjacent working groups in the 
> applications area of IETF, this
> seems... problematic  Comments?
>
> - David
> ~ Zha

Not to mention client services that are hosted on localhost might be 
using tcp or shared memory for extra speed (ala the SL media plugin).


Lawson