IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] [FORGED] RE: Fingerprint schemes versus what to fingerprint

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Tue, 12 April 2016 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D38712DCF5 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:35:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JrJ5x_mT1Y6h for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 789E212E378 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 09:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.80 #2 (Debian)) id 1aq1Hh-0003Xk-Tj for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 18:35:26 +0200
Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.84 #3 (Debian)) id 1aq1EV-0007S9-Ix; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 18:32:07 +0200
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@juniper.net>
References: <43986BDA-010F-4DBF-8989-53E71B74E66A@gmail.com> <20151110021943.GH3896@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> <72665D15-F685-41F6-A477-8E65DBBC5A04@gmail.com> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4C42AC4@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <sjm1t6c40uy.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4C56BF1@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <9652a57c1e22f4ac3d417aebca44851c.squirrel@mail2.ihtfp.org> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4C57DA7@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <87608.1460417298@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
OpenPGP: url=https://k.gnupg.net/80615870F5BAD690333686D0F2AD85AC1E42B367
Mail-Followup-To: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@juniper.net>, Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>, "openpgp\@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>, Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>, Bryan Ford <brynosaurus@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 18:32:07 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87608.1460417298@eng-mail01.juniper.net> (Mark D. Baushke's message of "Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:28:18 -0700")
Message-ID: <87zisyg54o.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/APc3geg6HcLgQjavVAzX-gKyXOI>
Cc: "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>, Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>, Bryan Ford <brynosaurus@gmail.com>, Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] [FORGED] RE: Fingerprint schemes versus what to fingerprint
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:35:32 -0000

On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 01:28, mdb@juniper.net said:

> I have not had any problems using PKCS#11 with GnuPG.
> See http://gnupg-pkcs11.sourceforge.net/

Which uses an internal interface of GnuPG and thus breaks with newer
GnuPG versions.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email