Re: Mandatory Algorithm Changes?

Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk> Mon, 21 February 2005 12:47 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA20410 for <openpgp-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 07:47:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j1LCIOAV091501; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:18:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id j1LCIOZj091500; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:18:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail.links.org (mail.links.org [217.155.92.109]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j1LCIIxw091396 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 04:18:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ben@algroup.co.uk)
Received: from [193.133.15.218] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.links.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A283933CC4; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:18:05 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <4219D182.3090203@algroup.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:18:10 +0000
From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
Cc: Jon Callas <jon@callas.org>, OpenPGP <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>
Subject: Re: Mandatory Algorithm Changes?
References: <20050208194442.F2C6A57E2A@finney.org> <42092EC2.9040501@systemics.com> <87zmyeyyg9.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <420A012A.5020204@systemics.com> <39c100e92dbc54b9fcb678d904676384@callas.org> <4219A890.3000603@algroup.co.uk> <87d5uu6upb.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
In-Reply-To: <87d5uu6upb.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:23:28 +0000, Ben Laurie said:
> 
> 
>>Oops. What I said was that this seems like a candidate for having
>>flags in the PGP certificates that say what is supported by the
>>receiving application(s).
> 
> 
> Sorry, I don't understand this.  We do have these preferences since
> the very beginning.

Sorry, not very well today, and it seems not thinking straight. So why 
is there an issue with compatibility?

BTW, I see that 5.2.3.7. says "It is assumed that only algorithms listed 
are supported by the recipient's software" but this language is not 
carried forward into 5.2.3.8/9. In fact 5.2.3.9 explicitly rules out 
indicating what exactly is supported ("...the key holder's software 
might have no compression software").

Cheers,

Ben.

-- 
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html       http://www.thebunker.net/

"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff