Re: Mandatory Algorithm Changes?

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Wed, 09 February 2005 08:10 UTC

Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA08733 for <openpgp-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 03:10:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j197ePv3009692; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 23:40:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id j197ePJ0009691; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 23:40:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [217.69.77.222] (may be forged)) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j197eOJW009393 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 23:40:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wk@gnupg.org)
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cyllv-0000S1-KC for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 07:56:23 +0100
Received: from wk by localhost with local (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CymRC-0002Tb-PP; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 08:39:02 +0100
To: Ian G <iang@systemics.com>
Cc: ietf-openpgp@imc.org
Subject: Re: Mandatory Algorithm Changes?
References: <20050208194442.F2C6A57E2A@finney.org> <42092EC2.9040501@systemics.com>
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
OpenPGP: id=5B0358A2; url=finger:wk@g10code.com
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 08:39:02 +0100
In-Reply-To: <42092EC2.9040501@systemics.com> (Ian G.'s message of "Tue, 08 Feb 2005 21:27:30 +0000")
Message-ID: <87zmyeyyg9.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>

On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 21:27:30 +0000, Ian G said:

> If both of the major OpenPGP implementations
> already support it, is there any reason to doubt
> the little guys will follow along eventually?

There are other implementations using OpenPGP as well.  For embedded
systems adding another MUST cipher is a problem, in particular if 3DES
is already done in (old) hardware.  There might also be the need to
implement the preferences system unless both, 3DES and AES, are
declared as fallback algorithms.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner