Re: Outstanding question - rule on cleartext signing last line

David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com> Thu, 08 December 2005 15:05 UTC

Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkNL7-0007Y0-F5 for openpgp-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:05:48 -0500
Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA24853 for <openpgp-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 10:04:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jB8EqDLS087456; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 06:52:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id jB8EqDv0087455; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 06:52:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from foobar.cs.jhu.edu (foobar.cs.jhu.edu [128.220.13.173]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jB8EqCfA087439 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 06:52:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dshaw@jabberwocky.com)
Received: from walrus.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (walrus.hsd1.ma.comcast.net [24.60.132.70]) by foobar.cs.jhu.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jB8EqAS31564 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:52:11 -0500
Received: from grover.jabberwocky.com (grover.jabberwocky.com [172.24.84.28]) by walrus.hsd1.ma.comcast.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id jB8Eq6X6006005 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:52:06 -0500
Received: from grover.jabberwocky.com (grover.jabberwocky.com [127.0.0.1]) by grover.jabberwocky.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jB8Eq51H006000 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:52:05 -0500
Received: (from dshaw@localhost) by grover.jabberwocky.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id jB8Eq5fe005999 for ietf-openpgp@imc.org; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:52:05 -0500
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 09:52:05 -0500
From: David Shaw <dshaw@jabberwocky.com>
To: OpenPGP <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>
Subject: Re: Outstanding question - rule on cleartext signing last line
Message-ID: <20051208145205.GA5943@jabberwocky.com>
Mail-Followup-To: OpenPGP <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>
References: <43980274.2080404@iang.org> <20051208104150.GA14918@epointsystem.org> <43981C74.1070403@systemics.com> <87bqzrhj6i.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87bqzrhj6i.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
OpenPGP: id=99242560; url=http://www.jabberwocky.com/david/keys.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:23:01PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:43:48 +0000, Ian G said:
> 
> > But I think we need to hear from the PGP Inc and GPG
> > architects on this?
> 
> I recall that we tweaked gpg's behaviour in this regard until all
> users were satisfied.  Thus I'd say not to add new requirement to the
> specs.

I agree.  I think the spec is just fine in this regard: the final CRLF
(the one before the "-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----") is not part of
the signature.  That allows for the GPG behavior to preserve the
presence or lack of line ending on the last line.

David