Re: Outstanding question - rule on cleartext signing last line

nagydani@epointsystem.org (Daniel A. Nagy) Thu, 08 December 2005 13:03 UTC

Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EkLRE-0005Qe-Qw for openpgp-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 08:03:56 -0500
Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA11129 for <openpgp-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 08:02:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from above.proper.com (localhost.vpnc.org [127.0.0.1]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jB8CnucV061292; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 04:49:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/Submit) id jB8CnuGk061291; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 04:49:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning: above.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from mail.epointsystem.org ([195.228.156.120]) by above.proper.com (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id jB8Cnt8k061277 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 04:49:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nagydani@epointsystem.org)
Received: by mail.epointsystem.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 55D5262; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 13:49:54 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:49:54 +0100
To: OpenPGP <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>
Subject: Re: Outstanding question - rule on cleartext signing last line
Message-ID: <20051208124954.GB24621@epointsystem.org>
References: <43980274.2080404@iang.org> <20051208104150.GA14918@epointsystem.org> <43981C74.1070403@systemics.com> <87bqzrhj6i.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87bqzrhj6i.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: nagydani@epointsystem.org
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>

On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:23:01PM +0100, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:43:48 +0000, Ian G said:
> 
> > But I think we need to hear from the PGP Inc and GPG
> > architects on this?
> 
> I recall that we tweaked gpg's behaviour in this regard until all
> users were satisfied.  Thus I'd say not to add new requirement to the
> specs.

I, for one, like the way GPG behaves in this respect very much. Any change
to the spec that would make gpg's current behavior non-compliant should be
considered harmful, IMHO.

-- 
Daniel