Re: [openpgp] Padding packets
"Neal H. Walfield" <neal@walfield.org> Fri, 17 June 2022 12:58 UTC
Return-Path: <neal@walfield.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8577DC157B34 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 05:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x_D1Wtk41XWP for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 05:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.dasr.de (mail.dasr.de [202.61.250.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B73DDC15791C for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 05:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p5de92acd.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.233.42.205] helo=forster.huenfield.org) by mail.dasr.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <neal@walfield.org>) id 1o2BXy-0002YY-1v; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:57:58 +0200
Received: from grit.huenfield.org ([192.168.20.9] helo=grit.walfield.org) by forster.huenfield.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <neal@walfield.org>) id 1o2BXx-00Gu71-El; Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:57:57 +0200
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:57:57 +0200
Message-ID: <87k09fh2ga.wl-neal@walfield.org>
From: "Neal H. Walfield" <neal@walfield.org>
To: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
Cc: Ángel <angel@16bits.net>, openpgp@ietf.org, "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
In-Reply-To: <o17TAfJTeOZkYp5X-XwNQwnTrCaiKEGnn1ZAL1qLB5CTGKntjwv6dpCIah44pAdH8nHXa4ivte_MMtqXuKP3uhobW5kJk9E6rAEWneD11yA=@protonmail.com>
References: <87wndi88ri.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de> <83cce07c67f67c19b06c0c4239b6f335512a9a6f.camel@16bits.net> <o17TAfJTeOZkYp5X-XwNQwnTrCaiKEGnn1ZAL1qLB5CTGKntjwv6dpCIah44pAdH8nHXa4ivte_MMtqXuKP3uhobW5kJk9E6rAEWneD11yA=@protonmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.20.9
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: neal@walfield.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on forster.huenfield.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/HWrcy8a8AH2b6H40qShhEiQII30>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Padding packets
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 12:58:05 -0000
Hi Daniel, On Fri, 17 Jun 2022 14:52:50 +0200, Daniel Huigens wrote: > I agree that deterministic incompressible data is better than random > data in this context. > > ... > > I went with an all-zero key instead of the hash of the previous packet, > as I didn't see a need for binding the padding to the preceding packet, > and always using the same (deterministic) padding seemed fine to me, > however, let me know if you disagree or see a need for that. One issue I see with this type of deterministic padding is that if a message or archive contains multiple padding packets, then it will be compressible. That will not be the case if we bind the padding to the preceding packet. Neal
- [openpgp] Padding packets Werner Koch
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets Paul Schaub
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets Ángel
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets brian m. carlson
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets Werner Koch
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets Daniel Huigens
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets Neal H. Walfield
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets Daniel Huigens
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets Daniel Huigens
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets Daniel Huigens
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets Daniel Huigens
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets Daniel Huigens
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets Stephen Farrell
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [openpgp] Padding packets Stephen Farrell