Re: [openpgp] v5 interoperability

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Tue, 16 April 2024 12:45 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=08360b673e=wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756D5C151542 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gnupg.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MXXx3eZFLi6T for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ellsberg.gnupg.com (ellsberg.gnupg.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:151:7306::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 767D9C14F610 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:45:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnupg.org; s=20181017; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zf4FHX6yKmWp9MqBPhqwITGC60/TTUnTAavy7iymSoM=; b=GAiPy08f4DXGI6LN3V1LnJaYZc 4pRlAW2p+xBTScdC3XtJeSCjE0ESrv+QE4b7EJMmzZtTseYIb9hGJkvVIloh1/JNe1T9XBUPEpk7K dukkokcmPT45t84h+UEv/rQwTsrDxbxoM+l/u5w455iPjQ72Qc5+ddaeoidxncW08CVs=;
Received: from uucp by ellsberg.gnupg.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.94.2 (Devuan)) (envelope-from <wk@gnupg.org>) id 1rwiBH-0006AS-Et for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:44:59 +0200
Received: from wk by jacob.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.96 (Devuan)) (envelope-from <wk@gnupg.org>) id 1rwiAc-0003zx-3C; Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:44:18 +0200
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: Andrew Gallagher <andrewg=40andrewg.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Kai Engert <kaie@kuix.de>, IETF OpenPGP WG <openpgp@ietf.org>
References: <87frvllpzw.fsf@jacob.g10code.de> <F76D7D7D-6E02-49A7-81FE-90454B827688@andrewg.com>
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
Jabber-ID: wk@jabber.gnupg.org
Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Gallagher <andrewg=40andrewg.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Kai Engert <kaie@kuix.de>, IETF OpenPGP WG <openpgp@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:44:13 +0200
In-Reply-To: <F76D7D7D-6E02-49A7-81FE-90454B827688@andrewg.com> (Andrew Gallagher's message of "Tue, 16 Apr 2024 08:50:36 +0100")
Message-ID: <875xwhlboi.fsf@jacob.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=Echelon_rail_gun_mega_LLC_AFSPC_ASLET_Al-Shabaab_NSCT_Dateline_Tucso"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/IXnEqgWrF0-iQJYesu8_pdfrJ3M>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] v5 interoperability
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 12:45:08 -0000

On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 08:50, Andrew Gallagher said:

> In the current draft of openpgp-pqc, it looks like only the algid is required
> in the fixedinfo:

That is correct.  However, this was done because all parameters of the
algos are identified by the algoid.  We don't do this as explained in my
mail

  https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/librepgp-discuss/2024/000043.html

and thus we need to identify the Kyber version and the curve which can
easily be done using the fingerprint.

I'll post an updated specs in a few days.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service.             - A. Einstein