Re: [openpgp] v5 interoperability

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Sun, 14 April 2024 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=0834ceaadc=wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DC1C14E513 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 02:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gnupg.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tilDBVlHSg3w for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 02:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ellsberg.gnupg.com (ellsberg.gnupg.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:151:7306::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6E24C14F5FE for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 02:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnupg.org; s=20181017; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=1Nw1zPizYrwF6TLcgGBm8xBUpIgwC0q0KO8VpCDBnNc=; b=AaEJEpjQ03m21ciF9bSuQ7MJP6 u1Od3TZLvi+X13cuJ5MnRtKkxMSNOF5Rfdxlfd++eyasRTjCt6vDyYwZ9u44i4m62zrFLK9yD6nTp bVrcnFb8x3k0EG8QZ0YK0J6Uc71O07/5iOceVA+rNuw7m5bemIffk5k7Y46A79H1VCDg=;
Received: from uucp by ellsberg.gnupg.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.94.2 (Devuan)) (envelope-from <wk@gnupg.org>) id 1rvwAW-00041F-Gf for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 11:29:00 +0200
Received: from wk by jacob.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.96 (Devuan)) (envelope-from <wk@gnupg.org>) id 1rvwBT-00036O-0E; Sun, 14 Apr 2024 11:29:59 +0200
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: Andrew Gallagher <andrewg=40andrewg.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Paul Schaub <vanitasvitae@riseup.net>, openpgp@ietf.org
References: <AF3B73A2-09D7-4BB3-9826-92E6CA18C6A9@riseup.net> <5C762D0A-06A8-4E8A-B6EA-B427880642EB@andrewg.com>
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
Jabber-ID: wk@jabber.gnupg.org
Mail-Followup-To: Andrew Gallagher <andrewg=40andrewg.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Paul Schaub <vanitasvitae@riseup.net>, openpgp@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 11:29:52 +0200
In-Reply-To: <5C762D0A-06A8-4E8A-B6EA-B427880642EB@andrewg.com> (Andrew Gallagher's message of "Sat, 13 Apr 2024 00:07:42 +0100")
Message-ID: <877ch0mgvj.fsf@jacob.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=South_Africa_DynCorp_NACSI_orthodox_United_Nations_Secure_Border=Ini"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/u2bkIl88KhKBXKRefHm7IXT-GAY>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] v5 interoperability
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2024 09:29:11 -0000

On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 00:07, Andrew Gallagher said:

> Werner has since stated that he changed his mind about this and now
> doesn’t plan to implement v6 sigs. So that’s one potential issue

Right, your v6 signatures re-introduced the old flaw of not signing the
meta data of the literal data packet.  Something we had fixed before
that fix was removed after fall 2021.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that
refuse military service.             - A. Einstein