Re: [openpgp] Requesting the editor to step down

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Mon, 27 April 2020 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <wk@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA833A085F for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gnupg.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EW30RvgRm9g0 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kerckhoffs.g10code.com (kerckhoffs.g10code.com [IPv6:2001:aa8:fff1:100::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A5983A085C for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnupg.org; s=20181017; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=TA4xy7qX6lwe+r5npNM9DJkKpZY+MzfuSUKN5mTbrS4=; b=F8cijdeHdMOODAmBddKhviiul5 mplMvoHooJ2dgxNLepzZx6iK+vBdhSvCaMKO5oEJvBpXBXAaDaHYl6UIMQDGY2ioJrIIRaV6C53Tj o+72v5jiP7LZDpzj6IGq6OzGVKsVW/N7ZTEqtggp2fGF2WjLJ7HX76aq8nfEQA+uOJa4=;
Received: from uucp by kerckhoffs.g10code.com with local-rmail (Exim 4.89 #1 (Debian)) id 1jT2ya-0007nD-LU for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:35:08 +0200
Received: from wk by wheatstone.g10code.de with local (Exim 4.92 #5 (Debian)) id 1jT2wl-0006uu-GM for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:33:15 +0200
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
References: <3J6ZOTPGPXG6Y.2JRNW7TO2C5HZ@my.amazin.horse> <877dy1ql46.fsf@europa.jade-hamburg.de>
Organisation: GnuPG e.V.
X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text.
Mail-Followup-To: openpgp@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 14:33:03 +0200
In-Reply-To: <877dy1ql46.fsf@europa.jade-hamburg.de> (Justus Winter's message of "Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:27:37 +0200")
Message-ID: <87r1w92jnk.fsf@wheatstone.g10code.de>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=COSCO_BZ_Plane_Saudi_Arabia_Disaster_medical_assistance_team_Artisti"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/SPsdWpf2Kjtkel5z3jfaGAupROI>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Requesting the editor to step down
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:35:20 -0000

Hi!

On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:27, Justus Winter said:

>   - At the general meeting of the GnuPG e.V. in 2018 (Brussels,
>     2018-02-02) we asked if and how we or the Verein can help the
>     standardization effort.  Werner declined any help, dismissing the

Right, the minutes say nothing about this [1].  However, I remember very
well and just checked with another participant that after the official
meeting you and Neal asked the _GnuPG_ Verein for financial support for
Sequoia development; which was obviously rejected.

Given the continued personal attacks I will just once list a few facts
as background for other readers:

- Neal, Kai and Justus are founding members of the Verein.  Further they
  all were employed by my company to work on GnuPG.

- I have asked them several times to work on assigned tasks including
  pushing forward 4880bis; which they mostly ignored.

- One of them started to talk with the pEp Foundation, a competitor,
  about cooperation falsely pretending to officially speak for my
  company.

- After I rejected the plan to completely rewrite GnuPG in Rust and
  asked for weekly work reports, they moved on to the pEp Foundation.
  There they wrote there own implementation based on the experience they
  collected in the years working at my company.

- I am also quite disappointed to see folks, whom I once considered
  friends, to behave in public like they do now.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner


[1] https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gnupg-verein.git;a=blob;f=office/meetings/gm-2018-02_minutes.pdf
-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.