Re: Encoding "secret key is hashed"
Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> Fri, 24 August 2001 17:01 UTC
Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA09694 for <openpgp-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:01:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) id f7OGluY24659 for ietf-openpgp-bks; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 09:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kasiski.gnupg.de (porta.u64.de [194.77.88.106]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7OGlsD24655 for <ietf-openpgp@imc.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 09:47:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uucp by kasiski.gnupg.de with local-rmail (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15aKzp-000389-00; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 19:43:53 +0200
Received: from wk by alberti.gnupg.de with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15aKB7-0006fj-00; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:51:29 +0200
To: ietf-openpgp@imc.org
Subject: Re: Encoding "secret key is hashed"
References: <p0510031eb7ab8e4df9e4@[192.168.1.180]> <00cd01c12c9d$aa0f46a0$c23fa8c0@transarc.ibm.com> <87ofp5bjim.fsf@alberti.gnupg.de> <012a01c12cb5$a358e7e0$c23fa8c0@transarc.ibm.com>
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
Organisation: g10 Code GmbH
X-PGP-KeyID: 621CC013
X-Request-PGP: finger://wk@g10code.com
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:51:28 +0200
In-Reply-To: <012a01c12cb5$a358e7e0$c23fa8c0@transarc.ibm.com> ("Michael Young"'s message of "Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:58:38 -0400")
Message-ID: <873d6hbdv3.fsf@alberti.gnupg.de>
Lines: 13
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ietf-openpgp@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-openpgp/mail-archive/>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-openpgp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
List-ID: <ietf-openpgp.imc.org>
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:58:38 -0400, Michael Young said: > I strongly recommend hashing the entire contents, including the public > key material. If you wanted to leave out the material between the I agree with your proposal. Werner -- Werner Koch Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur g10 Code GmbH et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est. Privacy Solutions -- Augustinus
- Diffs for next draft Jon Callas
- Re: Diffs for next draft Werner Koch
- Re: Diffs for next draft Jon Callas
- Re: Diffs for next draft Edwin Woudt
- Re: Diffs for next draft Jon Callas
- Encoding of "features" subpacket Michael Young
- Re: Diffs for next draft Michael Young
- Re: Encoding of "features" subpacket Jon Callas
- Re: Diffs for next draft David Shaw
- Re: Diffs for next draft David Shaw
- Re: Diffs for next draft Jon Callas
- Klima/Rosa attack (was: Re: Diffs for next draft) Edwin Woudt
- Encoding "secret key is hashed" Michael Young
- Re: Klima/Rosa attack (was: Re: Diffs for next dr… Ingo Luetkebohle
- Re: Encoding "secret key is hashed" Edwin Woudt
- Re: Encoding "secret key is hashed" Werner Koch
- Re: Encoding "secret key is hashed" Michael Young
- Re: Encoding "secret key is hashed" Michael Young
- Re: Encoding "secret key is hashed" Ingo Luetkebohle
- Re: Encoding "secret key is hashed" Werner Koch
- Re: Encoding "secret key is hashed" Michael Young
- Re: Diffs for next draft Jon Callas
- Re: Diffs for next draft David Shaw
- Re: Diffs for next draft Werner Koch
- How to update a self-signature? Michael Young
- Re: How to update a self-signature? David Shaw
- Re: Diffs for next draft Florian Weimer
- Re: How to update a self-signature? Werner Koch
- Re: How to update a self-signature? Derek Atkins
- Re: How to update a self-signature? Florian Weimer
- Re: How to update a self-signature? David Shaw
- Re: How to update a self-signature? David Shaw
- Re: How to update a self-signature? Derek Atkins
- Re: How to update a self-signature? Werner Koch
- Re: How to update a self-signature? David Shaw
- Re: How to update a self-signature? Werner Koch
- Keyserver thoughts (was Re: How to update a self-… David Shaw
- Certification revocation -- identifying the revok… Michael Young
- Re: Certification revocation -- identifying the r… Thomas Roessler