Re: [openpgp] saltpack on OpenPGP message format problems

Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz> Fri, 12 February 2016 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322091A00F9 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 05:51:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BNnF90orjNrU for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 05:51:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.auckland.ac.nz (mx4.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.125.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 104851A00FD for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 05:51:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=auckland.ac.nz; i=@auckland.ac.nz; q=dns/txt; s=mail; t=1455285074; x=1486821074; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=aglYDygfIfpVGaBxXAtkj5PcLpAVCM/9pcsm6CUPnOY=; b=4Zq4e5xxXcIwLO+xuh6roj6j2P2r9EmBe8xcvXuAg/LhD/Y0ztczu+Ob G/F2dFaqyM4CcLTNsgVyuA19q1e0wPelHvgzBjPLDYtnoyKgt4NmpTnwG 5y8x3pJ3oJQ7E5UMrrzDsz/+BBEn4BwhnRyWunCS5Vrolq+NGYPSSxSmi N6BrwWka9z45Wo/a6H8hQx3Au2cPlC54iTK28bRBuhGkoRbvo8Vw9mIQh YqyafBY+nO6qBw33H2lTdWuUdCOEmAf8IPUQXwO+c0+1ZOjOlxg5YVPHi uYQO+q3KaxjX99J7GPV4KdWsaEFymU46iSn7SRbrSwhuz0XvZXgNh2PcB w==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,436,1449486000"; d="scan'208";a="67627147"
X-Ironport-HAT: MAIL-SERVERS - $RELAYED
X-Ironport-Source: 130.216.4.171 - Outgoing - Outgoing
Received: from exchangemx.uoa.auckland.ac.nz (HELO uxchange10-fe4.UoA.auckland.ac.nz) ([130.216.4.171]) by mx4-int.auckland.ac.nz with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 13 Feb 2016 02:51:12 +1300
Received: from UXCN10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([169.254.5.153]) by uxchange10-fe4.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([169.254.109.63]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 02:51:12 +1300
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
To: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
Thread-Topic: [openpgp] saltpack on OpenPGP message format problems
Thread-Index: AQHRZKovrCMKgX/VlESZgKvALMTRbp8ob3DK
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:51:11 +0000
Message-ID: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4BEE527@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
References: <56BB0308.8020504@iang.org> <20160210160641.GA3090@singpolyma-liberty> <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73F4BED18C@uxcn10-5.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>, <87lh6rbp5n.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
In-Reply-To: <87lh6rbp5n.fsf@vigenere.g10code.de>
Accept-Language: en-NZ, en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-NZ
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.216.158.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/kyMNZZJSYU0MTF3wQI2lcQk_f_4>
Cc: Stephen Paul Weber <singpolyma@singpolyma.net>, "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>, ianG <iang@iang.org>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] saltpack on OpenPGP message format problems
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:51:19 -0000

Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> writes:

>How do you want to paste binary data into a contact web form or a Git commit
>message?  The OpenPGP Armor makes this really easy and, fwiw, X.509 uses a
>similar armoring technique.

I dunno because that's not my area of expertise, but somehow every other
software mechanism in existence has managed to get by without needing its own
custom "ASCII armoring" (is there anything other than PGP that does this?), so
I'm guessing it's a solved problem.

>Regarding PGP/MIME, it might be worth to consider dropping the need for the
>ASCII armor in favor of standard MIME encoding.  This would also help to sort
>out faulty PGP/MIME implementations.

That would certainly help with usability, since 99.9% of the time it's
completely redundant and better handled through other mechanisms.

Peter.