[openpgp] WTF (Re: AEAD Chunk Size)

Andre Heinecke <aheinecke@gnupg.org> Mon, 18 March 2019 21:53 UTC

Return-Path: <aheinecke@gnupg.org>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF271311A0 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gW-Ib-OSJoaF for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:53:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.heinecke.or.at (mail.heinecke.or.at [159.69.149.236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4AE131188 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 14:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.heinecke.or.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C32B3ED45 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 22:53:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.heinecke.or.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.heinecke.or.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qnVQW3f27k4p for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 22:53:45 +0100 (CET)
Received: from esus.localnet (193-80-87-252.hdsl.highway.telekom.at [193.80.87.252]) (Authenticated sender: andre@heinecke.or.at) by mail.heinecke.or.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 329D73E8A9 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 22:53:45 +0100 (CET)
From: Andre Heinecke <aheinecke@gnupg.org>
To: openpgp@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 22:53:44 +0100
Message-ID: <18491354.eQth273D07@esus>
In-Reply-To: <87mumh33nc.wl-neal@walfield.org>
References: <87mumh33nc.wl-neal@walfield.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4518279.az5CKMTa4R"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/n3Fw1TOgDir6CoP7fIQcKc5eF8Y>
Subject: [openpgp] WTF (Re: AEAD Chunk Size)
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 21:53:51 -0000

Hi,

You know I would love to follow all discussions here but this thread feels 
somehow like a denial of service attack. I can't get though it.

I need a tl;dr; here. Honestly. Today I saw replies in three different branches 
of this thread and I think it just got out of hand.

My tl;dr; is (and I'm sure you'all will correct me if I'm wrong):

1. The AEAD chunk size in the current proposal is too variable.
2. Neal proposed using a fixed chunk size.
2.3. Some people had points that spoke against it.
3. There was a compromise offered with a smaller "variable chunk size".

Then you wen't off the rails and repeatedly talked by and around each other and 
off topic. Here is where you lost me. This thread now has some epic (rambling) 
proportions.

Can we somehow get some clear "votable" proposals out of this thread?
I mean really. This stuff does not have to be so complicated as you make it 
out?! Just write in as few (that is a _good_ thing) words as possible what 
your proposal ist now. Maybe we could then vote on it or something like that?
"Chunk size should be between 512byte and 128MiB" does not sound so 
complicated to me.

I mean I really do not want to disrespect your efforts but I think there is 
valuable time of OpenPGP implementors wasted in this thread repeating 
themselfs and I really want to move forward with 4880bis


Best Regards,
Andre

-- 
GnuPG.com - a brand of g10 Code, the GnuPG experts.

g10 Code GmbH, Erkrath/Germany, AG Wuppertal HRB14459
GF Werner Koch, USt-Id DE215605608, www.g10code.com.

GnuPG e.V., Rochusstr. 44, D-40479 Düsseldorf.  VR 11482 Düsseldorf
Vorstand: W.Koch, M.Gollowitzer, A.Heinecke.    Mail: board@gnupg.org
Finanzamt D-Altstadt, St-Nr: 103/5923/1779.   Tel: +49-2104-4938799