IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] ABNF Grammar for PGP [Was: [saag] openpgp draft in WGLC, reviews welcome...]

Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com> Fri, 15 July 2022 11:03 UTC

Return-Path: <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D04DC157B4F for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 04:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pb3FKiKbWZLF for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 04:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch (mail-40134.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9854DC157B42 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 04:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:03:27 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1657883015; x=1658142215; bh=IzqSfvlGFqRgUK2t0AJtGfYDKDH3OZE5C7g+PKw4Yg0=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To: Feedback-ID:Message-ID; b=Zo/A6sQIOuEgaeLsf7yZcko+65pPMa80Y+dBPiKTBDyURJkOZuJ5Bpqtg7YihAFPq LicFnnZiX1yT3w5W6OU5LSnOX63cSe9BzwE8awNvkwqDZcVs5XV1RmsOjvG4r1TE6g l6VNgp2S8BhSvz4WLleWmb0OPXnVuOvUAidGHaRs916CrIgTOVA4bMh4AKuh+tnRG/ dcq5CWF3Si9qxZdr/DibFqBKSwDe5Qfki+K6SA5vzw+lrzc7WcoocwvLBhuGMmlF8J ZhL4QWNF6wuH9UiK81R95gnNIyyYrQsPksoviCCfcUQOLJysTw1HItTesTobPdC2vc /y1bFriCpi8Kg==
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
Cc: "Shafranovich, Yakov" <yakovsh@amazon.com>, "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
Reply-To: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <JCzc03Tv9xp85zdq6ErhHeer60oZFTGIIszIwPWUYxWBsHJQNImV9__KeYBeEGK1sOLAaVxahar9zBgsr9ESPZzX0h28iIsCG1Vk7HbDhBw=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9c497fab-f4bc-bdb2-b763-4372aee33ed7@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <1E3A9301-3D0B-43D6-B39A-219098081712@amazon.com> <9c497fab-f4bc-bdb2-b763-4372aee33ed7@cs.tcd.ie>
Feedback-ID: 2934448:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/zQMmSaiM2LPc-DaB0DZviZ0ttwE>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] ABNF Grammar for PGP [Was: [saag] openpgp draft in WGLC, reviews welcome...]
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:03:43 -0000

Hi,

I agree, I'm not opposed to this work of course but it seems out of
scope for the crypto refresh.

Best,
Daniel


------- Original Message -------
On Friday, July 15th, 2022 at 12:50, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:

> Hiya,
>
> I created a gitlab issue for this one. [1]
>
> Given there's been no reaction to this suggestion
> on the list so far, I think it's the case that we
> have rough consensus to not try define ABNF as
> suggested at this time.
>
> Please correct me if I'm wrong before Tuesday 19th.
>
> Note that devoting effort to better ABNF could be
> something to be suggested for work after 4880bis is
> done - if someone wants to make a case for doing
> that, please feel free.
>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
> [1] https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/issues/133
>
> On 30/06/2022 14:55, Shafranovich, Yakov wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are there plans to add ABNF grammar to the current draft? My co-author and me had to add a subset of OpenPGP ABNF to our own RFC [1] recently and it was not trivial to figure out.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > [1] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9116.html#name-file-format-description-and
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> > From: Stephen Farrell stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie
> > Date: Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 10:20 AM
> > Subject: [saag] openpgp draft in WGLC, reviews welcome...
> > To: saag@ietf.org saag@ietf.org
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The OpenPGP working group has started a WGLC for it's
> > "crypto-refresh" draft. [1]
> >
> > As stated in the mail starting WGLC [2], we'd like to
> > get reviews by July 3rd. Please send reviews or other
> > comments to openpgp@ietf.org
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stephen.
> >
> > [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh/
> > [2]
> > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/LAMorYvThRXucv11FxADkl1COvw/
>
> _______________________________________________
> openpgp mailing list
> openpgp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email