IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OPSAWG] Can we please adopt draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng?

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 09 November 2020 19:23 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915063A100C for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 11:23:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT=2, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EdUEJ0QI75oQ for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 11:23:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 365BF3A0985 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 11:23:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=194; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1604949837; x=1606159437; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject: message-id:date:to; bh=OlOXZG0xQARNqlENouYiTwkQ/4SuRJEsQcUJ4ONkI9Y=; b=Pd4XS12CG4gNQXyKC2m9kbGnbXA2ayepuiokKmDcnrweIjLr0DCy+u+R GN9kyh0a6nRipYSgHbQ8obZGKCb5bSndb5Ic339efVQ96WVL8WGKwVvW+ HI/KWKGszBvm2UdlRo6GGD9VHAY708OFrhgabPf1tBJGG8bIGqu1wmBl2 I=;
X-IPAS-Result: A0AhBQA+lqlf/xbLJq1igQmFQgEyhGuJBYd2nFELAQEBDQEBLwQBAYRAgh8mOBMCAwEBAQMCAwEBAQEFAQEBAgEGBHGFbYYcgQsCJgJfgzmDB59pjhl2gTKFV4RygQ4qjVqCAIERJwwQimIzgiwEuCaCdwSDFpdzAx+DBgERihKFI48jsDKDYgIEBgUCFYFrI4FXMxoIGxVlAYI/PRIZDZxpQANoAgYBCQEBAwmOSAEB
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,464,1596499200"; d="scan'208";a="28549256"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 09 Nov 2020 19:23:53 +0000
Received: from [10.61.163.71] ([10.61.163.71]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0A9JNquP004883 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 19:23:53 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Message-Id: <DB082EF6-9150-49B5-87FE-1322C3AB8A72@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 20:23:52 +0100
To: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.163.71, [10.61.163.71]
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/4Cvm_msdnORHMUY3kbyCV6dbGyI>
Subject: [OPSAWG] Can we please adopt draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng?
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 19:23:59 -0000

This is good work, it’s a format used everywhere.  We also need a registry for option extensions that IANA could provide.  And we have some ideas as to how to use that.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email