Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-schoenw-syslog-msg-mib-00.txt
Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Fri, 02 May 2008 14:02 UTC
Return-Path: <opsawg-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsawg-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-opsawg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED4E28C227; Fri, 2 May 2008 07:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233DB28C234 for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2008 07:02:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.975
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.975 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.274, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RsWrROsIYR-8 for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2008 07:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CD728C1D7 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2008 07:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius2.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.47]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00AF5C000C; Fri, 2 May 2008 16:02:48 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius2.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UdOuBpOC+sxA; Fri, 2 May 2008 16:02:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.iuhb02.iu-bremen.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37957C000F; Fri, 2 May 2008 16:02:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 716BC550975; Fri, 2 May 2008 16:02:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 16:02:35 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Bert Wijnen - IETF <bertietf@bwijnen.net>
Message-ID: <20080502140235.GD836@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: Bert Wijnen - IETF <bertietf@bwijnen.net>, sob@harvard.edu, ted.a.seely@sprint.com, opsawg@ietf.org
References: <20080429212928.GA27372@elstar.local> <NIEJLKBACMDODCGLGOCNAECIENAA.bertietf@bwijnen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <NIEJLKBACMDODCGLGOCNAECIENAA.bertietf@bwijnen.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-schoenw-syslog-msg-mib-00.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: opsawg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: opsawg-bounces@ietf.org
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 03:41:05PM +0200, Bert Wijnen - IETF wrote: > In general I think a MIB module like this one makes sense and > will be usefull. > > Some comments: > > - I see 2 writable objects at the beginning of the MIB module. > But it is unclear what the expected persistency behaviour is. The author just did not know and yes this is where some input would actually be much appreciated. My preference would certainly be to make these two scalars be stored in nonvolatile memory. So I plan to add The value of this object should be kept in nonvolatile memory. to both DESCRIPTION clauses. > - Would it not be easier to use SnmpAdminString instead of > DisplayString? Do we never expect any of these fields to > contain Internationlized names? We tried carefully to follow what the SYSLOG specs say. Some message parts are ASCII while others may contain UTF-8. > - WHen I see: > If the first octets contain the value 'EFBBBF'h, then the rest > of the message is a UTF-8 string. Since syslog messages may be > truncated, the message may contain invalid UTF-8 encodings at > the end." > I wonder if it would not be better to truncate in such a way that > message allways contains valid UTF-8 encodings. > What was/is your motivation to not do that? The SYSLOG specification allows for arbitrary truncation; a SYSLOG implementation is allowed to truncate without having to parse the UTF-8 encoding. And since a truncated message may hit the SNMP engine, I think it is fair to allow to pass it on without trying to "fix" it. (And robust applications will have to be able to deal with truncated UTF-8 strings anyway.) > - I find these somewhat weird: > MIN-ACCESS accessible-for-notify > DESCRIPTION > "Read write access is not required." > > The MAX-ACCESS for this (and other) objects is read-only. > So the DESCRIPTION clause seems bogus. > I guess you mean that one does not need to support READ > (GET/HETNEXT/GETBULK) > access. You have several of those. Changed to "Read access is not required." > NITs/TYPOs > > - second para sect 1: > > This document defines an SNMP MIB modules to represent SYSLOG > > I guess you want to s/modules/module/ fixed > - page 9 > > For syslog messages without structured data element parameters > that were not truncted by the converter, none of the bits is > set." > > s/truncted/truncated/ fixed /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
- [OPSAWG] snmp and syslog mappings Juergen Schoenwaelder
- [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-schoenw-syslo… Bert Wijnen - IETF
- [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-syslo… Bert Wijnen - IETF
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-schoenw-s… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-schoenw-s… David Harrington
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… David Harrington
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-schoenw-s… Bert Wijnen - IETF
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… Bert Wijnen - IETF
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… David Harrington
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… David Harrington
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… Natale, Bob
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-marinov-s… Randy Presuhn