Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-schoenw-syslog-msg-mib-00.txt

"David Harrington" <ietfdbh@comcast.net> Fri, 02 May 2008 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <opsawg-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: opsawg-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-opsawg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA5B3A6B71; Fri, 2 May 2008 07:55:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46253A6AD6 for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2008 07:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XqwqX0vC8RuI for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2008 07:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.40]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22EB3A6D3E for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2008 07:55:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from OMTA13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.52]) by QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Lcjj1Z00R17dt5G540Ef00; Fri, 02 May 2008 14:53:18 +0000
Received: from Harrington73653 ([24.128.66.199]) by OMTA13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id LevW1Z0044HwxpC3Z00000; Fri, 02 May 2008 14:55:30 +0000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=oCkJ-acqMqAA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=11_e_heck7MtSgnKVskA:9 a=7y_iO_9u4l432CGSb6kA:7 a=QTyj58sDXWtqrFLGmUubezyTz10A:4 a=si9q_4b84H0A:10 a=hPjdaMEvmhQA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=2aF6lfeD-CsA:10 a=50e4U0PicR4A:10
From: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
To: 'Bert Wijnen - IETF' <bertietf@bwijnen.net>, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, sob@harvard.edu, ted.a.seely@sprint.com
References: <20080429212928.GA27372@elstar.local> <NIEJLKBACMDODCGLGOCNAECIENAA.bertietf@bwijnen.net>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 10:55:30 -0400
Message-ID: <009d01c8ac64$90ed7f90$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <NIEJLKBACMDODCGLGOCNAECIENAA.bertietf@bwijnen.net>
Thread-Index: AcisWjNuEVVPFtLQSiaUYd7kUJUPJQAAoByw
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] my initial review of draft-schoenw-syslog-msg-mib-00.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: opsawg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: opsawg-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

The discussion of truncation follows the syslog WG's protocol I-D.
I am not certain that it is necessary to state here that the trucation
might lead to incomplete UTF-8 characters, but it would probably be
more helpful than harmful. You might want to include a REFERENCE.

David Harrington
dbharrington@comcast.net
ietfdbh@comcast.net
dharrington@huawei.com
syslog WG co-chair

> -----Original Message-----
> From: opsawg-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bert Wijnen - IETF
> Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 9:41 AM
> To: j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de; sob@harvard.edu; 
> ted.a.seely@sprint.com
> Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
> Subject: [OPSAWG] my initial review of 
> draft-schoenw-syslog-msg-mib-00.txt
> 
> In general I think a MIB module like this one makes sense and
> will be usefull.
> 
> Some comments:
> 
> - I see 2 writable objects at the beginning of the MIB module.
>   But it is unclear what the expected persistency behaviour is.
> 
> - Would it not be easier to use SnmpAdminString instead of
>   DisplayString? Do we never expect any of these fields to
>   contain Internationlized names?
> 
> - WHen I see:
>          If the first octets contain the value 'EFBBBF'h, 
> then the rest
>          of the message is a UTF-8 string. Since syslog 
> messages may be
>          truncated, the message may contain invalid UTF-8 encodings
at
>          the end."
>   I wonder if it would not be better to truncate in such a way that
>   message allways contains valid UTF-8 encodings.
>   What was/is your motivation to not do that?
> 
> - I find these somewhat weird:
>       MIN-ACCESS  accessible-for-notify
>       DESCRIPTION
>           "Read write access is not required."
> 
>   The MAX-ACCESS for this (and other) objects is read-only.
>   So the DESCRIPTION clause seems bogus.
>   I guess you mean that one does not need to support READ
> (GET/HETNEXT/GETBULK)
>   access. You have several of those.
> 
> NITs/TYPOs
> 
> - second para sect 1:
> 
>    This document defines an SNMP MIB modules to represent SYSLOG
> 
>   I guess you want to s/modules/module/
> 
> - page 9
> 
>           For syslog messages without structured data element 
> parameters
>           that were not truncted by the converter, none of the bits
is
>           set."
> 
>   s/truncted/truncated/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
> 

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg