Re: [OPSAWG] ACTION NEEDED RE: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work
samier Barguil <samir.barguil@gmail.com> Fri, 19 April 2024 15:04 UTC
Return-Path: <samir.barguil@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D498C14F69A for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:04:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zHvcxYDeQdbs for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81F34C14F5EF for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2a58209b159so1561011a91.3 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713539081; x=1714143881; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=s4tkGyxGDO0acbQ6G06KMt8kDND+JsF5FmB15FltaBg=; b=iqomTJJtTuLCnGSg8fEH3ddau7wmnXQgSof0ZNUzPYRGlDZkjfNoB/GnLUq3ixZu+1 6gSgPx2S069Bt159mN29Mu6lAQ1VWzl/gvKNfts7J1NreY45Camb9z+JP9v4ZJZjOfu/ WzSOXJGHYcMg6CE+sHoJxAotBGTUBIqrkee96VOtidTbkqQyKyZFvtM1dyPwm1L2oY2k sUH33WLyzOaDtCxfSP683oK0vregDFUOEKdFpjLAgHdFVOR3Mb+v+1MNZganC3SP9xr5 WboPVpSpR4Homqz1lZvhgmavDGh4lNY73a0q5UK8cDRrSDHapGKtV6FhVuBRXd6Z943+ ON8w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713539081; x=1714143881; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=s4tkGyxGDO0acbQ6G06KMt8kDND+JsF5FmB15FltaBg=; b=Re+gGSzc1uGncMx+H9jYUGC6RLeCikwPeZ61QdDfI7x8qv15QA7HszFZ0UEN+kZZYc b8cfErUnh/Jl5vbMJnkN7uTFaOWIY2gQklqxQ7pkIBUwq+QBR09Ra9WnvFy1oZsPxEEC 1uaddLBagt9OaeX8eNYVfDWLg5JLyyoW8Bz7JCxACgLxxhLsu4Eb2pd+upCwuS8XUSn9 yTwpq5cGC11WhyoBGfVo09A9cDmYpxGQofQ/M1tuf3cPt4DA4afRudNk/FNT1nr19OqP geipcEtfSJ2gIhjcbRdomNOckMbzMp67i8YwImlrlvwKFEwD+xhE5ZM9f5cQVEz49HXl IEtw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWQ8eSmMpIN4AiBsgvQeyI48aAK236xz+TBnlYhvqcX87ClSmmZxKSIRWWAm0FFN4HlTJdbYdxY902tbpiPpEM=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxtNJyAy5hrQPxVWIq0O5d2RuoYSGHptffiFuLG31+NQ3+2TVpT 9QbM7Ai6m6ls6ABPMAxGczcwp8Rzc/iZddtY+uIVn0i/2iasXCloRAhxqtPpPOdmvU3kiYm8ohC Nt4KI/qXH9eQOI4fnOHNOTKqOYQs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEbHn5hJJnaE1+yAm8ZkPoHEvU/KOlTkKUF7FkxYov1BCFGUQv7StyBderfbCjc2l9xv3F7F7oh0sjXt/LI7EM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1958:b0:29b:ad3a:7b01 with SMTP id nk24-20020a17090b195800b0029bad3a7b01mr2383742pjb.46.1713539080737; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BN9PR11MB53713BCF8BB7C7AFA935127AB80D2@BN9PR11MB5371.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <DU2PR02MB101601EE429E28AE4C114BBFA880D2@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DU2PR02MB101601EE429E28AE4C114BBFA880D2@DU2PR02MB10160.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
From: samier Barguil <samir.barguil@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 17:04:29 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEkR2kngo6N5=mNj7qh3wcOSCELAQ3TBBf2xOhe_2Pa2XinYzQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Joe Clarke (jclarke)" <jclarke@cisco.com>, opsawg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000375f850616746878"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/7XSJivzWzcQ1b9-GMECMCFhKOaI>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] ACTION NEEDED RE: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:04:42 -0000
Hi Joe, all, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts. Samier On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 4:45 PM <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > An IPR poll check is launched by the Chairs because the documents are in > the WGLC. > > > > Please consider replying to the attached message in a timely manner. Thank > you much. > > > > Cheers, > > Med > > > > *De :* BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET > *Envoyé :* vendredi 19 avril 2024 16:41 > *À :* 'Joe Clarke (jclarke)' <jclarke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; > opsawg@ietf.org > *Objet :* RE: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work > > > > Hi Joe, all, > > > > No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts. > > > > Cheers, > > Med > > > > *De :* OPSAWG <opsawg-bounces@ietf.org> *De la part de* Joe Clarke > (jclarke) > *Envoyé :* vendredi 19 avril 2024 16:32 > *À :* opsawg@ietf.org > *Objet :* [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work > > > > We’re up to WG LC on these four drafts. And while we did an IPR poll > before, we want to be thorough since this work has evolved. > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/ > > > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > > > > Please state either: > > > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts” > > or > > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to these drafts" > > > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > > > If yes to the above, please state either: > > > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules” > > or > > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > > appropriate. > > > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the > > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are > > aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next > > stage until a response has been received from each author. > > > > Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it. > > > > As of this time, no IPR has been disclosed on any of the four drafts. > > > > Joe > > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > >
- [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work Joe Clarke (jclarke)
- Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [OPSAWG] ACTION NEEDED RE: IPR POLL: Attachme… samier Barguil
- Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work LUIS ANGEL MUÑOZ, Vodafone
- Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work Qin Wu
- Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work Ogaki, Kenichi
- Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work Wubo (lana)
- Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work Oscar González de Dios
- Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work Victor Lopez
- Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work Richard Roberts
- Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work Ivan Bykov
- Re: [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work Joe Clarke (jclarke)