Re: [OPSAWG] [Fwd: Your thoughts on draft-richardson-mud-qrcode]

[Tianran Zhou <[e-mail]>]

Hi Adrian,

IMO, whether to apply ISE or WG adoption depends on the authors themselves.
If I recall right, we did not get the adoption request from the authors.
We welcome MUD related work, and we will consider from many aspects, like:
1. any conflict to existing solution
2. wg interests
...

But anyway, the WG mailing list could always be the place we can discuss about this technique.

Best,
Tianran
-----Original Message-----
From: RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel) [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 6:20 PM
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: [Fwd: Your thoughts on draft-richardson-mud-qrcode]

Hi OPSAWG chairs,

I wrote to you at the start of Janusary about draft-richardson-mud-qrcode/  which is derived from draft-richardson-opsawg-securehomegateway-mud

My question was whether, in your opinion, this should be in the OPSAWG or it is OK for it to be published in the Independent Stream.

I also wondered if you are aware of any history related to the document that you could share with me.

I see from the mailing list that Michael has raised the draft on the list a couple of times, but without any follow-up.

What I'd like to know (and the WG can contribute to this discussion) is whether this is something that the WG would like to complete and publish in the IETF stream.

Any thoughts?

Thanks,
Adrian
--
Adrian Farrel (Independent Stream Editor), [e-mail]