Re: [OPSAWG] VM-MIB: Proposal: Joe-2 (was Re: Comments on draft-asai-vmm-mib-04)

Hirochika Asai <panda@hongo.wide.ad.jp> Fri, 30 August 2013 01:35 UTC

Return-Path: <panda@hongo.wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39A811E8192 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:35:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.904
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.904 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_JP=1.244, HOST_EQ_JP=1.265, RELAY_IS_203=0.994]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C7CSMEyty0Q1 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hongo.wide.ad.jp (mail.hongo.wide.ad.jp [203.178.135.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CEF11E815B for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:34:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:200:180:8001:2d89:d0e8:a170:d0f1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:200:180:8001:2d89:d0e8:a170:d0f1]) by mail.hongo.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E1EA108DE5F; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:25:42 +0900 (JST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
From: Hirochika Asai <panda@hongo.wide.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <E0251DFB-1D54-4442-89CD-C94ACCFB0F10@hongo.wide.ad.jp>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 10:35:00 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3C80E218-DCAD-4FAA-9F4C-BC8A3BED67D4@hongo.wide.ad.jp>
References: <521158A7.2090407@cisco.com> <742382451.32805118.1376935335411.JavaMail.root@vmware.com> <52126061.2000008@cisco.com> <531716211.32859971.1376937482642.JavaMail.root@vmware.com> <52128177.9020600@cisco.com> <767970431.33038278.1376945535247.JavaMail.root@vmware.com> <521285FE.2020507@cisco.com> <E0251DFB-1D54-4442-89CD-C94ACCFB0F10@hongo.wide.ad.jp>
To: Joe Marcus Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] VM-MIB: Proposal: Joe-2 (was Re: Comments on draft-asai-vmm-mib-04)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 01:35:03 -0000

Oops, I'm sorry that there was the answer earier in this thread.  Joe
mentioned the former, i.e., management IP addr of a VM.  So please
ignore my question to Joe.

But let me ask to the list about the virtual IPMI implementation.
> Does anybody know such other implementations of the virtual IPMI?
> If there are, we may need to take into account them.
I couldn't find any other implementations of the virtual IPMI, so my
opinion is that we do not need an object related to the virtual IPMI
or something like it.  If you find any, I'd like you to let me know.

Thank you,
Hirochika


On Aug 30, 2013, at 10:17 AM, Hirochika Asai <panda@hongo.wide.ad.jp> wrote:

> Hi Joe,
> 
> Thank you for your comments.
> 
> I have a question on the management address.  Do you mean a
> management interface that is attached to virtual machine as a
> network interface and that cannot be distinguished as a
> management interface from the hypervisor w/o VMware tools etc?
> Or, do you mean a management interface provided by the hypervisor
> for a virtual machine (let's call it a virtual IPMI here)?
> 
> If you mean the former, I think it is reasonable to include it in
> entLogicalTable of ENTITY-MIB but not in the VMM-MIB .  However,
> if you mean the latter, I think it should be included in the VMM-MIB.
> 
> There is a patch of the virtual IPMI for qemu though it haven't been
> merged the trunk as follows:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-07/msg02516.html
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-07/msg02525.html
> 
> Does anybody know such other implementations of the virtual IPMI?
> If there are, we may need to take into account them.
> 
> Thank you,
> Hirochika
> 
> 
> On Aug 20, 2013, at 5:54 AM, Joe Marcus Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 8/19/13 4:52 PM, Michael MacFaden wrote:
>>>> If I understand you right this time, and the VM
>>>> inserts entLogicalTable entries in the HV ENTITY-MIB, would it not make
>>>> sense to add a pointer in the VMM-MIB to indicate their index in the
>>>> entLogicalTable?
>>> 
>>> Yes, exactly. Create a row in entLogicalTable if there is data to provide
>>> regarding pointers to agents in GOS and have a way to get at it to/from 
>>> the VMM-MIB.
>> 
>> Okay, so in that case I would change Joe-2 to ask for an object in this
>> table to point to such a conceptual row (or 0).
>> 
>> Joe
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Joe Marcus Clarke, CCIE #5384,         |          |
>> SCJP, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, VCP        |||||      |||||
>> Distinguished Services Engineer ..:|||||||||::|||||||||:..
>> Phone: +1 (919) 392-2867         c i s c o  S y s t e m s
>> Email: jclarke@cisco.com
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPSAWG mailing list
>> OPSAWG@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Hirochika Asai <panda@hongo.wide.ad.jp>, The University of Tokyo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
> 

-- 
Hirochika Asai <panda@hongo.wide.ad.jp>, The University of Tokyo