IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] VM-MIB: Proposal: Joe-2 (was Re: Comments on draft-asai-vmm-mib-04)

Michael MacFaden <mrm@vmware.com> Fri, 30 August 2013 05:40 UTC

Return-Path: <mrm@vmware.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8FA21F999E for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l623wU9KnJKa for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com [208.91.2.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B73A21F994A for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:40:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sc9-mailhost3.vmware.com (sc9-mailhost3.vmware.com [10.113.161.73]) by smtp-outbound-1.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07A92838E; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcs-prod-mta-2.vmware.com (zcs-prod-mta-2.vmware.com [10.113.163.64]) by sc9-mailhost3.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92A0402FC; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcs-prod-mta-2.vmware.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zcs-prod-mta-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2509E0049; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zcs-prod-mbox-9.vmware.com (lbv-sc9-t2prod2-int.vmware.com [10.113.160.246]) by zcs-prod-mta-2.vmware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:40:22 -0700
From: Michael MacFaden <mrm@vmware.com>
To: Hirochika Asai <panda@hongo.wide.ad.jp>
Message-ID: <953549733.3762987.1377841222039.JavaMail.root@vmware.com>
In-Reply-To: <A2727E80-97CF-414A-AF6E-30855EF3F719@hongo.wide.ad.jp>
References: <521158A7.2090407@cisco.com> <52128177.9020600@cisco.com> <767970431.33038278.1376945535247.JavaMail.root@vmware.com> <521285FE.2020507@cisco.com> <E0251DFB-1D54-4442-89CD-C94ACCFB0F10@hongo.wide.ad.jp> <3C80E218-DCAD-4FAA-9F4C-BC8A3BED67D4@hongo.wide.ad.jp> <359743075.3699910.1377827047802.JavaMail.root@vmware.com> <A2727E80-97CF-414A-AF6E-30855EF3F719@hongo.wide.ad.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.113.163.68]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.3_GA_5664 (ZimbraWebClient - GC23 (Mac)/8.0.3_GA_5664)
Thread-Topic: VM-MIB: Proposal: Joe-2 (was Re: Comments on draft-asai-vmm-mib-04)
Thread-Index: EAcR0Nv4jeHRxCMYTl/AzOaA1ydHTA==
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] VM-MIB: Proposal: Joe-2 (was Re: Comments on draft-asai-vmm-mib-04)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 05:40:37 -0000

> Yes, I agree that the MIB module shouldn't preclude adding any
> functionalities.
> So we'd better not to have the virtual IPMI object in the MIB in order not to
> prevent adding them from developers.

I agree.

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email