IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Chongfeng Xie <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn> Tue, 06 December 2022 05:20 UTC

Return-Path: <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D9EC14CF0B for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 21:20:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ECbwlvZr4NwD for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 21:20:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.220]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1735FC14F743 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 21:20:36 -0800 (PST)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.188:40168.980774713
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-219.142.69.78 (unknown [172.18.0.188]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 0E8C9280094; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 13:20:29 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 66040161@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([219.142.69.78]) by app0023 with ESMTP id 9f8f838e29814bb2a9c83bab3b9cf51c for opsawg@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2022 13:20:33 CST
X-Transaction-ID: 9f8f838e29814bb2a9c83bab3b9cf51c
X-Real-From: xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 219.142.69.78
X-MEDUSA-Status: 0
Sender: xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 13:20:31 +0800
From: Chongfeng Xie <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn>
To: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
Cc: opsawg <opsawg@ietf.org>
References: <BN9PR11MB537174D17B1613C8F98EC08AB8159@BN9PR11MB5371.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>, <ZRAP278MB01762386EC1F7E3FFF909E6989149@ZRAP278MB0176.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
X-Priority: 3
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.24.96[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202212061320307457545@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_001_NextPart588657263122_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/SBwuxrzhKoIkVf1wnO36YTrzNn4>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2022 05:20:41 -0000

Hi Chairs, folks,

I support the Last Call of this draft.

The approach defined in this draft is very useful for operators who have deployed SRv6, and the text is well written, I hope it can progress and enter a new stage to meet the requirement of SRv6 operation.  

Thanks are given to the authors for their work.

Best regards

Chongfeng

From: OPSAWG <opsawg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 2:54 PM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
 
Hello, WG.  As discussed at IETF 115, we want to conduct a WG LC for draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh.  The authors believe this work is stable and moreover used the 115 hackathon to develop a interoperable implementations (linked in Data Tracker) .  Additionally, IANA has already weighed in on this work and agree with the considerations approach.
 
Therefore, we are calling for a two week LC.  We will conclude on December 14.
 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/
 
Please review the current -04 draft, post your comments and/or your thoughts on the current text.
 
Thanks.
 
Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email