[OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8907 (7754)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 10 January 2024 12:36 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24E7C14F6F5 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 04:36:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.658
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.658 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E0902bkpXJ4Q for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 04:36:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11C54C14F6EA for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 04:36:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id C33371BA3F99; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 04:36:16 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: jpaulovf@gmail.com, thorstendlux@google.com, andrej@ota.si, dcmgash@cisco.com, carrel@ipsec.org, lol.grant@gmail.com, opsawg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240110123616.C33371BA3F99@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 04:36:16 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/hH9TujWrOdriQHG2LFZIIvrkCgc>
Subject: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8907 (7754)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 12:36:20 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8907, "The Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7754 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Joao Fracarolli <jpaulovf@gmail.com> Section: 6.1 Original Text ------------- The rem_addr_len indicates the length of the port field, in bytes. Corrected Text -------------- The rem_addr_len indicates the length of the rem_addr field, in bytes. Notes ----- Substitute "port field" with "rem_addr field" Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8907 (draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-18) -------------------------------------- Title : The Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) Protocol Publication Date : September 2020 Author(s) : T. Dahm, A. Ota, D.C. Medway Gash, D. Carrel, L. Grant Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Operations and Management Area Working Group Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8907 (775… RFC Errata System
- Re: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8907 … Rebecca VanRheenen
- Re: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8907 … Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8907 … Douglas Gash (dcmgash)