Re: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8907 (7754)

Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com> Wed, 10 January 2024 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99788C090385 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 09:35:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wBbrPfu-bO_p for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 09:35:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD018C469B28 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 09:34:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD399424CD3F; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 09:34:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ZRXJFMEcG7u; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 09:34:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:a051:47ca:f20:e0b4] (unknown [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:a051:47ca:f20:e0b4]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A0D7424B455; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 09:34:22 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240110123616.C33371BA3F99@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 09:34:21 -0800
Cc: jpaulovf@gmail.com, thorstendlux@google.com, andrej@ota.si, dcmgash@cisco.com, carrel@ipsec.org, lol.grant@gmail.com, opsawg@ietf.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2BDD918F-20B8-4C67-B0C1-5C594B70D020@amsl.com>
References: <20240110123616.C33371BA3F99@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/vjNjzwO6P1LTjbRJ2PmpE_Ffl9s>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8907 (7754)
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:35:54 -0000

Hi Robert,

We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial, so we changed the Type to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).

Note: A similar issue appears in Section 5.1 (perhaps “user field” here should also read “rem_addr” field):

      The rem_addr_len indicates the length of the user
      field, in bytes.

You may review the report at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7754

Information on how to verify errata reports can be found at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/

Further information on errata can be found at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php

Thank you.

RFC Editor/rv


> On Jan 10, 2024, at 4:36 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8907,
> "The Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) Protocol".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7754
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Joao Fracarolli <jpaulovf@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 6.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> The rem_addr_len indicates the length of the port field, in bytes.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> The rem_addr_len indicates the length of the rem_addr field, in bytes.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Substitute "port field" with "rem_addr field"
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8907 (draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-18)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : The Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) Protocol
> Publication Date    : September 2020
> Author(s)           : T. Dahm, A. Ota, D.C. Medway Gash, D. Carrel, L. Grant
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Operations and Management Area Working Group
> Area                : Operations and Management
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>