IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC on draft-ietf-opsawg-mpls-tp-oam-def

sob@harvard.edu (Scott O. Bradner) Tue, 01 February 2011 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@harvard.edu>
X-Original-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918E23A6C01 for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:27:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.24 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.359, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HUTDaT7RuxWa for <opsawg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:27:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (newdev.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18DB3A6BFA for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:27:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id 64DD181FB61; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 11:30:21 -0500 (EST)
To: ietfc@btconnect.com, opsawg@ietf.org, sob@harvard.edu
In-Reply-To: <025501cbc21f$ef5215e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Message-Id: <20110201163021.64DD181FB61@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 11:30:21 -0500
From: sob@harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC on draft-ietf-opsawg-mpls-tp-oam-def
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:27:05 -0000

>  I assume that this is still
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-opsawg-mpls-tp-oam-def-07.txt

yup

> How long have we got?

sigh - should have said - two weeks (til feb 14)

Scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email