IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-04

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 12 April 2021 23:33 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD253A1624; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DZrhWDA_98hD; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF0FB3A168F; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1lW63H-000861-2t; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:33:07 +0000
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:33:06 -0700
Message-ID: <m2lf9nt6x9.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: Rob Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, Ops Area WG <opsawg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds.all@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <6B3DCBE7-CB7D-421F-9CF3-78E0C6EEC61F@vigilsec.com>
References: <MN2PR11MB4366E7BB3CE2A26FB6C3FB1DB5709@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <m2pmyztcbl.wl-randy@psg.com> <6B3DCBE7-CB7D-421F-9CF3-78E0C6EEC61F@vigilsec.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/lvh4vYgkryyLymPqWmdz2j9ma10>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-04
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:33:13 -0000

>>> 3. The definition of canonicalization refers to section 2.2 of RFC
>>> 5485 (which talks about ASCII) vs RFC8805 which talks about UTF-8.  Is
>>> this disparity an issue?
>> 
>> russ, how do you want to handle?
> 
> This is really about line endings, but it would probably be best to
> assign a content type for UTF8 Test with CRLF.

yuchh.  send text, if you would please.

>>   This document also suggests optional data for geofeed files to
>>>   provide stronger authenticity to the data.
>>> 
>>> Would "optional signature data" be clearer than just "optional data"?
>> 
>> ok.  russ?  maybe 'authenticating'?
> 
> How about: ... optional signature, which authenticates the data when
> present.

        This document also suggests optional signature, which
        authenticates the data when present, for geofeed files to
        provide stronger authenticity to the data.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email