Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt

Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com> Mon, 24 June 2019 02:37 UTC

Return-Path: <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA06712009E for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 19:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qhkq_unrvEI3 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 19:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ABEA120019 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2019 19:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C8E94F55D3539D4865A6 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 03:37:42 +0100 (IST)
Received: from NKGEML411-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.70) by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.45) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 03:37:42 +0100
Received: from NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.134]) by nkgeml411-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.70]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 10:34:44 +0800
From: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: I-D Action: draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt
Thread-Index: AdUn4716jyLgN7rjSFKc6ovUA1F6+wCT7MvA
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 02:34:43 +0000
Message-ID: <BBA82579FD347748BEADC4C445EA0F21BEE5D164@NKGEML515-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA49A6AE8@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA49A6AE8@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.156.116]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/uRek9TWCgbXtgfLrnkrcRcfZ6RU>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsawg/>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 02:37:47 -0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Qin Wu
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 11:47 AM
> To: Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran@huawei.com>; opsawg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: I-D Action:
> draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt
> 
> Hi, Tianran:
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Tianran Zhou
> 发送时间: 2019年6月21日 11:11
> 收件人: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>; opsawg@ietf.org
> 主题: RE: I-D Action:
> draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt
> 
> Hi Qin and the authors,
> 
> I think this is a valuable work as a comprehensive thinking on the model driven
> work in IETF.
> I am very interested on the architecture, the classification, the mapping
> methodology, etc.
> 
> Some points may be useful:
> 1. When I am looking at the " Figure 1: An overview of IETF YANG Modules",
> I think it's better not to list the specific models in "Network Service Models".
> Or you can use for example. Otherwise people may think those are the only
> considered service models in IETF.
> [Qin]: Fair point, I intend to use them as example modules and will make this
> clear in the figure 1, e.g., add "etc" for each category of models.
> 
> 
> 2. While I think it's really good to investigate "all" the current models
> in IETF, you may not need to list them in the main content. You can keep the
> classification, the introduction to each category, the inter-connectivity
> description. But I suggest to move the "document:introduction" to the
> appendix. As you mentioned, the document identifies a comprehensive list of
> modules to exemplify the proposed approach, but the document does not claim
> to be exhaustive. The list may keep exploding and make the document not stable.
> 
> [Qin]: The rationale behind is first list what model does IETF have on the
> table and then discuss how these models are put together, move model
> introductions to appendix may make people feel disconnected, in my personal
> view. Yes, we have statement to say we are not intending to enumerate all
> IETF defined YANG models. We can add a few text in each section title to say
> the models listed here are just examples. One example such section title could
> be:
> "2.1.1.  Network Service Models: Definition and Samples".
> Does this address your concern?

Hi Qin,

I am OK with this modification. This makes the draft more clear.
Maybe, a better way is to state only your perspective and conclusion in the main content. The examples, from my perspective, are support material. I am afraid they will affect people to focus on your points, especially when you give each one model an abstract. 
But this is trivial compared to your work have done in the draft. :-)

Cheers,
Tianran



> More comments will come later.
> 
> Cheers,
> Tianran
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Qin Wu
> > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2019 10:38 AM
> > To: opsawg@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action:
> > draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt
> >
> > Hi, Folks:
> > We have submitted an v-04 of
> > draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization based on feedback on
> > the ML and last IETF meeting discussion
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wu-model-driven-management
> > -v
> > irtualization-04
> > And would like to solicit more feedback on this draft.
> >
> > The goal of this draft is to discuss how top down top down built model
> > (e.g., customer-facing data models) interact with bottom up built
> > model (network resource-facing data models) in the context of service
> > delivery and assurance.
> >
> > The document identifies a comprehensive list of modules to exemplify
> > the proposed approach, but the document does not claim to be exhaustive.
> >
> > Further Comments, suggestions, input are welcome.
> >
> > -Qin (on behalf of coauthors)
> > -----邮件原件-----
> > 发件人: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org] 代表
> > internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > 发送时间: 2019年6月19日 20:14
> > 收件人: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> > 主题: I-D Action:
> draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> > directories.
> >
> >
> >         Title           : A Framework for Automating Service and Network
> > Management with YANG
> >         Authors         : Qin Wu
> >                           Mohamed Boucadair
> >                           Young Lee
> > 	Filename        :
> > draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualization-04.txt
> > 	Pages           : 37
> > 	Date            : 2019-06-19
> >
> > Abstract:
> >    Model-driven service and network management provides a programmatic
> >    and standard-based approach for representing (virtual) services or
> >    networks and configuration to the network device that are used to
> >    build and deliver the service.  Models can be used at various phases
> >    of service and network management life cycle such as service
> >    instantiation, service provisionning, optimization, monitoring, and
> >    diagnostic.  Also, models can be designed to automate network
> >    management and provide closed-loop control for the sake of adaptive
> >    and deterministic service creation, delivery, and maintenance.
> >
> >    This document provides a framework that describes and discusses an
> >    architecture for service and network management automation with YANG
> >    modeling technologies.  An applicability of YANG data models to
> >    automation of virtualized network service is also investigated.
> >
> >    The document aims to exemplify an approach to illustrate the journey
> >    from technology-agnostic services to technology-specific actions.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-model-driven-management-virt
> > ua
> > lization/
> >
> > There are also htmlized versions available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wu-model-driven-management-virtualiz
> > at
> > ion-04
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wu-model-driven-management
> > -v
> > irtualization-04
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-wu-model-driven-management-vir
> > tu
> > alization-04
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > I-D-Announce mailing list
> > I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
> > _______________________________________________
> > OPSAWG mailing list
> > OPSAWG@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg