Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC on draft-bdqks-arin-shared-transition-space

<Stan.Barber2@cox.com> Thu, 08 September 2011 11:56 UTC

Return-Path: <stan.barber2@cox.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E41921F8B36 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 04:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kt2J4sPGSTEi for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 04:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from post6.cox.com (post6.cox.com [24.248.74.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BC621F8B24 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 04:56:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([192.168.74.254]) by post6.cox.com with ESMTP with TLS id 5503604.424849722; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:58:43 -0400
Received: from CATL0MS112.corp.cox.com ([169.254.1.108]) by CATL0MS403.corp.cox.com ([10.62.236.91]) with mapi; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 07:58:43 -0400
From: Stan.Barber2@cox.com
To: owen@delong.com, wesley.george@twcable.com
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 07:58:42 -0400
Thread-Topic: [OPSAWG] WGLC on draft-bdqks-arin-shared-transition-space
Thread-Index: Acxtw7tn+rNST6cNS5Ke4l0pvvPpmQAWrv0Q
Message-ID: <D4759D49578EC2458DD252B993155A2E095EB683FA@CATL0MS112.corp.cox.com>
References: <20110901154335.8E474EB1EA1@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu> <34E4F50CAFA10349A41E0756550084FB0DF09129@PRVPEXVS04.corp.twcable.com> <4A7C4308-04D2-4403-BFC9-0B189448525B@delong.com> <34E4F50CAFA10349A41E0756550084FB0E0D5DAF@PRVPEXVS04.corp.twcable.com> <ED5A1260-931A-480B-93B8-374CE057BBB6@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <ED5A1260-931A-480B-93B8-374CE057BBB6@delong.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 04:57:38 -0700
Cc: draft-bdgks-arin-shared-transition-space@tools.ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org, draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC on draft-bdqks-arin-shared-transition-space
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 11:56:58 -0000

Owen,

This matches my understanding as well and I was presenting at the meeting in Quebec.

Wes, 

Can you point out where it seemed this changed?

-----Original Message-----
From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen@delong.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:05 PM
To: George, Wesley
Cc: Scott O. Bradner; opsawg@ietf.org; draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request@tools.ietf.org; draft-bdgks-arin-shared-transition-space@tools.ietf.org; Ronald Bonica
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC on draft-bdqks-arin-shared-transition-space


On Sep 7, 2011, at 2:26 PM, George, Wesley wrote:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen@delong.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 6:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WGLC on draft-bdqks-arin-shared-transition-space
> 
> This document is not the justification for draft-weil, it is a description of a set of recommended use cases for the space set aside in draft-weil.
> __________
> WEG] Draft-weil has been stripped of nearly all of its justification with the expectation that it would exist in another draft, and its language disagrees with you:
>  "The applicability of and justification for Shared Transition Space is
>   described in [I-D.bdgks-arin-shared-transition-space]."
> 

Interesting... That's news to me. I had been told that it was strictly the applicability document and not that we needed to also include the justification.