IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] WGLC on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-02

Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Sat, 16 February 2013 00:30 UTC

Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4537721F8460 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:30:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.453
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.453 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.146, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qcf4uSnDKvL9 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:30:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web01.jbserver.net (web01.jbserver.net [93.186.182.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C03821F8754 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:30:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 95-132-17-190.fibertel.com.ar ([190.17.132.95] helo=[192.168.1.113]) by web01.jbserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <fgont@si6networks.com>) id 1U6Vek-0007ma-BQ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 01:29:30 +0100
Message-ID: <511ED2DB.5080005@si6networks.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:29:15 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
References: <0DF8F7D8-01EF-44AC-9ABB-A48D7E4855FC@kumari.net> <99E981C1-88DA-4BED-9E1C-8914BB271223@kumari.net> <AD28E3FE-25C3-42D0-9AF2-2408315FDA40@kumari.net> <05A89A20-7639-49BC-AB18-CF150590F7AA@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <05A89A20-7639-49BC-AB18-CF150590F7AA@kumari.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: opsec@ietf.org, opsec chairs <opsec-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] WGLC on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-02
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 00:30:25 -0000

Hi, Warren,

On 02/12/2013 05:13 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> The WGLC concluded on Feb 1st, and the chairs judge there to be
> consensus on progressing the document…
> 
> Authors -- I believe that there were some comments / nits that you
> wanted to fold in.  Please do so. We will then give the WG three or
> four days just to make sure that the changes haven't materially
> affected the meaning, and then ship it to the IESG…

Thanks so much for the note!

We will publish a revision of the document that includes the received
feedback asap, so that we ship that version to the IESG.

Thanks!

Best regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email