Re: [OPSEC] WGLC on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-02

On Jan 25, 2013, at 9:11 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:

> 
> On Jan 25, 2013, at 5:11 AM, Alec Waters <Alec.Waters@dataline.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Joel,
>> 
>>> if the third citation is factually incorrect in some fashion it should be dropped.
>>> 
>>>      [Waters2011] provides an example of how this could be achieved
>>>      using publicly available tools (besides incorrectly claiming the
>>>      discovery of a "0day vulnerability").
>> 
>> If the reference is deemed of value to the draft, I (as author of the reference) can reproduce it at another location minus all the 0day nonsense put in there by the "editors" at Infosec Institute.
> 
> <no hat>
> Personally I think that that would be useful, although another option would be for Fernando to remove the somewhat snide parenthetical…
> </no hat>

Sorry, this was spooled in a mail queue from a while back….

W

>> 
>> alec
>> -- 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPSEC mailing list
>> OPSEC@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>> 
> 
> --
> "When it comes to glittering objects, wizards have all the taste and self-control of a deranged magpie."
> -- Terry Pratchett
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
> 

--
"Let's just say that if complete and utter chaos was lightning, he'd be the sort to stand on a hilltop in a thunderstorm wearing wet copper armour and shouting 'All gods are bastards'."

    -- Rincewind discussing Twoflower (Terry Pratchett, The Colour of Magic)