IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] WGLC on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-02

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Wed, 30 January 2013 01:39 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C49E21F898A for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:39:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id suVfalUtAnTc for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:39:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A98421F88B2 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:39:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from joels-MacBook-Air.local (c-24-5-127-59.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.127.59]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0U1ZX15069834 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Jan 2013 01:35:34 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <510878DF.705@bogus.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 17:35:27 -0800
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:19.0) Gecko/20130117 Thunderbird/19.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alec Waters <Alec.Waters@dataline.co.uk>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
References: <0DF8F7D8-01EF-44AC-9ABB-A48D7E4855FC@kumari.net> <99E981C1-88DA-4BED-9E1C-8914BB271223@kumari.net> <5101EB24.2020204@bogus.com> <5103765D.801@si6networks.com> <510584AB.1070501@bogus.com> <5105B451.50008@si6networks.com> <8350146BADDCE04480B969B36967473D0253C5A5@ZEUS.olympus.dataline.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <8350146BADDCE04480B969B36967473D0253C5A5@ZEUS.olympus.dataline.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Wed, 30 Jan 2013 01:35:35 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: opsec chairs <opsec-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] WGLC on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets-02
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 01:39:16 -0000

On 1/29/13 7:15 AM, Alec Waters wrote:
> Hi Fernando,
>
>> What I can personally offer is to put it on my personal site. I'll wait
>> and see what Alec has to offer in this respect, anyway.
> How's this:
>
> http://wirewatcher.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/the-slaac-attack-using-ipv6-as-a-weapon-against-ipv4/
it's excellent.
> alec
> -- 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email