IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] Call for WG adoption - Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Tue, 27 November 2012 14:26 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4B021F86D4 for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 06:26:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GCPb0yQ0kEFz for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 06:26:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5423E21F84D7 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 06:26:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 85-7-200.lacnic.net.uy (unknown [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:5128:f904:aeae:640a:62b8]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98F630841C for <opsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:26:08 -0200 (UYST)
Message-ID: <50B4CD7E.4080903@lacnic.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:26:06 -0200
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: opsec@ietf.org
References: <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B240C8326F5@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B240C8326F5@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Call for WG adoption - Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 14:26:16 -0000

	I support WG adoption of draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-02.

	There are some comments that I have and I will send them later, however
their are not in opposition to wg adoption.

Regards,
as


On 27/11/2012 10:44, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) wrote:
> Dear,
> 
>  
> 
> 
>   Please find this request for WG adoption for “Network Reconnaissance
>   in IPv6 Networks”
> 
> 
>   This work is to update RFC5157. Please speak to voice your opinion.
> 
> 
>    
> 
> 
>   Latest draft can be found at:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-02
> 
>  
> 
> Kind Regards,
> 
> OPSEC chairs
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email