Re: [OPSEC] Call for WG adoption - Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks

John Schiel <jschiel@flowtools.net> Fri, 30 November 2012 05:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jschiel@flowtools.net>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1296121F841B for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:26:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oh9BOJ3Mf6jr for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:26:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D84821F8201 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:26:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c13so138298ieb.31 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:26:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=xWadFvX7bA4Ff85qAH6iF1d7AqDhoK0J+QZkaeuaJxo=; b=JK+fDL6xKAHm3EtxINanp4Y+zhVhHNMrari+uTVkfqJ/SyzkepEGe1vHjqGC58AMFe vwOQ8dbFuUu/BvG2gvjsquBRKFZ60lLFMd/OdwSj2otXCZn5oybA4LB8jmUhxl9c1RzK rVHxFSzQC3V3t/BuiDGaTiJfmm+vlIccobFaPMpxvCXqnfioWX0avNlVQ9OzWoaZYhgP BeRTbs3Lke9hz9frMN6UksKEG7JEFYjZ8HhGHA8eRbz11zXnr9vLKHoID4nNOaltWEnD FPc2RKfL3ekwjGEKjqR4kInwDQRWjEzOTiFkretcRezRknuOUCnpyQj6m7Xl/6XpCzAJ UvDg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.22.198 with SMTP id p6mr96472icb.17.1354253183567; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:26:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.50.20.131 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:26:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [63.227.55.100]
In-Reply-To: <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B240C8326F5@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>
References: <67832B1175062E48926BF3CB27C49B240C8326F5@xmb-aln-x12.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 22:26:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CABmZaCO1NOpEtjgcQEXxEphV=Mwjbnhe_pGmjnr5QhN0aVpgpw@mail.gmail.com>
From: John Schiel <jschiel@flowtools.net>
To: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkuv2pUKFFAoYOtDqa3Gjc7ge2l3sXutgNjpTSX/ziN88qXU48/cANVatSdYbR5g0Fpld51
Cc: "opsec@ietf.org" <opsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Call for WG adoption - Network Reconnaissance in IPv6 Networks
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 05:26:25 -0000

A few nits:

* Third paragraph in the introduction, "One one hand". Perhaps "On one hand" ?
* Title of section 2 should be fully bolded, missing bold on 'Techniques'
* 3.1.1.4. Stable Privacy-Enhanced Addresses

   In response to the predictability issues discussed in Section 3.1.1.1
   and the privacy issues discussed in , the IETF is currently **
(discussed in what,3.1.1.2? )

--John

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> wrote:
>
>         I support WG adoption of draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-02.
>
>         There are some comments that I have and I will send them later, however
> their are not in opposition to wg adoption.
>
> Regards,
> as
>
>
> On 27/11/2012 10:44, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) wrote:
>> Dear,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   Please find this request for WG adoption for “Network Reconnaissance
>>   in IPv6 Networks”
>>
>>
>>   This work is to update RFC5157. Please speak to voice your opinion.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   Latest draft can be found at:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-02
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> OPSEC chairs
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPSEC mailing list
>> OPSEC@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec



On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
<gvandeve@cisco.com> wrote:
> Dear,
>
>
>
> Please find this request for WG adoption for “Network Reconnaissance in IPv6
> Networks”
>
> This work is to update RFC5157. Please speak to voice your opinion.
>
>
>
> Latest draft can be found at:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-02
>
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> OPSEC chairs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>