Re: [OPSEC] Fwd: Reminder about IPR relating to draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets

["Will Liu (Shucheng)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Warren,

Sorry for being late.
I'm personally not aware of any relevant IPR. Thanks. 

Regards,
Will

> -------- Original Message --------
> From: Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>
> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:39:23 -0500
> Cc: Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Message-Id: <[e-mail]>
> References: <[e-mail]>
> To: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>,
> [e-mail]
> <[e-mail]>, opsec
> chairs <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Fwd: Reminder about IPR relating to
> draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets
> 
> For some reason this seems to have been eaten by the mailer...
> 
> Resending...
> 
> W
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>
> > Subject: Reminder about IPR relating to
> draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets
> > Date: January 24, 2013 12:02:07 PM EST
> > To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>,
> [e-mail], opsec chairs
> <[e-mail]>
> > Cc: Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>
> >
> > Dear OpSec WG,
> >
> > Be not alarmed.
> > This email was created to satisfy RFC 6702 "Promoting Compliance with
> Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"  (http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6702.txt).
> >
> > We are doing the IPR reminder in parallel with the WGLC so that we have
> all our ducks in a row...
> >
> > Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to
> draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets?  If so, has this IPR been
> disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules?
> > (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.)
> >
> > If you are a document author or listed contributor on this document,
> please reply to this email regardless of whether or not you are personally
> aware of any relevant IPR.  We might not be able to advance this document
> to the next stage until we have received a reply from each author and listed
> contributor.
> >
> > If you are on the OpSec WG email list but are not an author or listed
> contributor for this document, you are reminded of your opportunity for a
> voluntary IPR disclosure under BCP 79.  Please do not reply unless you want
> to make such a voluntary disclosure.
> >
> > Online tools for filing IPR disclosures can be found at
> <http://www.ietf.org/ipr/file-disclosure>.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Warren Kumari
> > (as OpSec WG co-chair)
> >
> > --
> > "I think perhaps the most important problem is that we are trying to
> understand the fundamental workings of the universe via a language devised
> for telling one another when the best fruit is." --Terry Prachett
> >
> >
> 
> --
> "I think perhaps the most important problem is that we are trying to
> understand the fundamental workings of the universe via a language
> devised for telling one another when the best fruit is." --Terry Prachett
> 
> 
> 
>