[OPSEC] Fwd: Reminder about IPR relating to draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets

[Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>]

For some reason this seems to have been eaten by the mailer… 

Resending…

W

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Reminder about IPR relating to draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets 
> Date: January 24, 2013 12:02:07 PM EST
> To: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, [e-mail], opsec chairs <[e-mail]>
> Cc: Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>
> 
> Dear OpSec WG,
> 
> Be not alarmed.                                                                                                                 
> This email was created to satisfy RFC 6702 "Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"  (http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6702.txt).                                                                                                            
> 
> We are doing the IPR reminder in parallel with the WGLC so that we have all our ducks in a row...                                                                                                                                
> 
> Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets?  If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules?
> (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.)
> 
> If you are a document author or listed contributor on this document, please reply to this email regardless of whether or not you are personally aware of any relevant IPR.  We might not be able to advance this document to the next stage until we have received a reply from each author and listed contributor.
> 
> If you are on the OpSec WG email list but are not an author or listed contributor for this document, you are reminded of your opportunity for a voluntary IPR disclosure under BCP 79.  Please do not reply unless you want to make such a voluntary disclosure.
> 
> Online tools for filing IPR disclosures can be found at <http://www.ietf.org/ipr/file-disclosure>.
> 
> Thanks,
> Warren Kumari
> (as OpSec WG co-chair)
> 
> --
> "I think perhaps the most important problem is that we are trying to understand the fundamental workings of the universe via a language devised for telling one another when the best fruit is." --Terry Prachett 
> 
> 

--
"I think perhaps the most important problem is that we are trying to understand the fundamental workings of the universe via a language devised for telling one another when the best fruit is." --Terry Prachett