Re: [OPSEC] Fwd: Reminder about IPR relating to draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets

On Jan 31, 2013, at 6:58 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> As noted below, I'm not aware of any relevant IPR.
> 
> That said, is it possible/desirable for these questions to be
> asked/answered off-list? (and then the results posted on list)

I think that for maximum transparency these are supposed to be / should be done onlist.
As well as getting each author / contributor to explicitly state that they have no IRP, it also reminds others to speak up if they know of any…

> 
> --  I must admit that the subject kind of scared me into "who the h*
> filed an IPR on this document?" :-)

Fair enough -- the ams thing has happened to me a few times… I'll try to remember to reword the subject line in the future to avoid the startle factor..

> 
> 
> On 01/31/2013 04:39 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>>> Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to
>>> draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets?
> 
> No. And I'd be surprised if there was (is that even possible)?

In the crazy world of IPR it seems that almost anything is possible….

W

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Fernando Gont
> SI6 Networks
> e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
> PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
> 

--
"Let's just say that if complete and utter chaos was lightning, he'd be the sort to stand on a hilltop in a thunderstorm wearing wet copper armour and shouting 'All gods are bastards'."

    -- Rincewind discussing Twoflower (Terry Pratchett, The Colour of Magic)