IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] Test for acceptance as WG document draft-dugal-opsec-protect-control-plane-02

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 26 April 2010 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791623A68D4 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:30:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0on3AjMJWelG for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.kumari.net (smtp.kumari.net [216.177.58.220]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD4E3A67A4 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:29:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp.kumari.net (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 0E6B8228464A; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:27:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dot.her.corp.google.com (unknown [74.202.225.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.kumari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D05642284090; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:27:33 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <891D8A4E-66FA-4FDB-874E-B9469F0313E1@kumari.net>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BCB4CCB.60803@bogus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:29:42 -0400
References: <4BCB4CCB.60803@bogus.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: "'opsec@ietf.org'" <opsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Test for acceptance as WG document draft-dugal-opsec-protect-control-plane-02
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:30:00 -0000

I support this...

W
On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:

> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dugal-opsec-protect-control-plane-02
>
> was discussed at IETF 77 and previous drafts have hadfeedback from  
> this
> this list lodged against them...
>
> This email kicks of the mailing list call for consensus to accept this
> work as a working group document.
>
> Commentary in the wg meeting was as noted in the minutes was favorable
> among those who had read it. and subsequent comments on the list hae
> also been favorable, this exercise is intended to formalize that
> understanding.
>
> Deadline for commnentary is sunday april 25th.
>
> thanks
> joel
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

--
Some people are like Slinkies......Not really good for anything but  
they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the  
stairs.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email