IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OPSEC] Test for acceptance as WG document draft-dugal-opsec-protect-control-plane-02

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Fri, 30 April 2010 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AE33A6936 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.999, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QewGbzuWc5a8 for <opsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:42:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B9D3A690A for <opsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.103.16.172] ([192.103.16.172]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3UHg8Os089783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:42:09 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4BDB1664.5070208@bogus.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:41:56 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "'opsec@ietf.org'" <opsec@ietf.org>, David Dugal <ddugal@juniper.net>, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
References: <4BCB4CCB.60803@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BCB4CCB.60803@bogus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:42:09 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Test for acceptance as WG document draft-dugal-opsec-protect-control-plane-02
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:42:31 -0000

Deadline has come and gone,

Opinion expressed by additional comments to the list has been favorable. 
There have been no objections.

there appears no barrier to acceptance as a WG document.

thanks
joel

On 4/18/2010 11:17 AM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dugal-opsec-protect-control-plane-02
>
> was discussed at IETF 77 and previous drafts have hadfeedback from this
> this list lodged against them...
>
> This email kicks of the mailing list call for consensus to accept this
> work as a working group document.
>
> Commentary in the wg meeting was as noted in the minutes was favorable
> among those who had read it. and subsequent comments on the list hae
> also been favorable, this exercise is intended to formalize that
> understanding.
>
> Deadline for commnentary is sunday april 25th.
>
> thanks
> joel
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email