Re: scenarios for Directory Synchronization
Barbara Jennings <bjjenni@somnet.sandia.gov> Fri, 28 July 1995 17:06 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14739; 28 Jul 95 13:06 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14735; 28 Jul 95 13:06 EDT
Received: from haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14487; 28 Jul 95 13:06 EDT
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk by haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id <g.04260-0@haig.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Fri, 28 Jul 1995 17:19:53 +0100
Received: from somnet.sandia.gov by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.09848-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Fri, 28 Jul 1995 17:19:32 +0100
Received: (from bjjenni@localhost) by somnet.sandia.gov (8.6.10/8.6.10) id KAA24089; Fri, 28 Jul 1995 10:26:42 -0600
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Barbara Jennings <bjjenni@somnet.sandia.gov>
Message-Id: <199507281626.KAA24089@somnet.sandia.gov>
Subject: Re: scenarios for Directory Synchronization
To: Alan Wong <wong@osison.osiware.bc.ca>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 10:26:42 -0600
Cc: awon@osison.osiware.bc.ca, osi-ds@cs.ucl.ac.uk, PGUPTA@hss.hns.com
In-Reply-To: <950727755*wong@vancouver.osiware.bc.ca> from "Alan Wong" at Jul 27, 95 03:48:00 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 1979
Praveen, > > Regarding data mapping, I proposed "Rule Based Mapping" for most of the > E-mail users who have, only, one account as a normal case (of course, > without notice of users with two e-mail account, two DNs will be > generated). For Two email account users, There can be exception > handling i.e. "Treating them seperately" on a case to case basis. > Such accounts can become part of exception handling by NOT > Synchronising them through normal synchronisation mechanism. > This will require LESS administration overheads for maintaining > Directory. A strong word of caution again Praveen - in my experience, EXCEPTION case handling require more administration and are difficult to hand over to second level support. If you intend to be 'one-deep' for support, or the only one providing the support you stand a better chance of accurate administration of the exceptions - however; even you may forget the exceptions from time to time. We do offer users two mail accounts, one for internal and one for external. This required alteration in the directory synchronization process; the internal address was sent to the mail systems focused on internal communication, and the external address is provided via RFC822 addressing in X.500. Presenting two accounts to the world is confusing. Additonally, a user may think that they prefer two accounts, until they forget to check one and find that they have missed a very important meeting. I recommend users to stay with one account. In a 'perfect' world, each organization would have only one source for e-mail provision anyway. [SOAP BOX! PERSONAL OPINION!] Barbara ============================================================= Barbara Jennings Sandia National Laboratory Scientific Computing Systems - Org. 13918 P.O. Box 5800 - MS 0807 Albuquerque, NM 87185-0807 USA jennings@sandia.gov Voice (505)845-8554 Fax (505)844-3075 =============================================================
- scenarios for Directory Synchronization PGUPTA
- Re: scenarios for Directory Synchronization Barbara Jennings
- Re: scenarios for Directory Synchronization Praveen Gupta, x2106
- Re: scenarios for Directory Synchronization Colin Robbins
- Re: scenarios for Directory Synchronization Praveen Gupta, 91-11-6470831/32 x2106
- Re: scenarios for Directory Synchronization Lawrence Hutson
- Re: scenarios for Directory Synchronization Alan Wong
- Re: scenarios for Directory Synchronization Alan Wong
- Re: scenarios for Directory Synchronization Alan Wong
- Re: scenarios for Directory Synchronization Alan Wong
- Re: scenarios for Directory Synchronization Barbara Jennings