IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5250 (2981)

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Wed, 28 September 2011 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F354011E80A0 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.514
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.514 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.085, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FNBUH+wOsxbv for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933EE11E80B0 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 08:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=stbryant@cisco.com; l=2322; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1317224665; x=1318434265; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P6aI189c1T21a9km0gW/uX/2NyHB0Y6dQpK0SKCudYg=; b=eKo5G2Liymy45XbYGFtoPSc9kzHOvz0V6/pbMVApr5QskB7Vu3jI5SLm XTlbqndqHApUYckKTRQxilcODY9wQxuohsXfO8LFPF26GK2nfJFhGditm x8NpdvzRh7/r1Y6+9EOt0TP+ROvj886mEAgRtujUTgIXQ093M9AcE75Y8 U=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,456,1312156800"; d="scan'208";a="56597909"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.72.81]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Sep 2011 15:44:24 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.70.36]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p8SFiOr9023592; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:44:24 GMT
Received: from stbryant-mac2.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id p8SFiKWJ029272; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:44:21 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <4E8340D4.5070406@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:44:20 +0100
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
References: <20110928143401.C54F198C260@rfc-editor.org> <48B7CFFE-2B7E-4997-B94A-0520468B8BE3@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <48B7CFFE-2B7E-4997-B94A-0520468B8BE3@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "alex.zinin@alcatel-lucent.com" <alex.zinin@alcatel-lucent.com>, "gcote@awardsolutions.com" <gcote@awardsolutions.com>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>, "none@rfc-editor.org" <none@rfc-editor.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5250 (2981)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:41:38 -0000

Acee

Do you think that anyone will be seriously confused
or make an implementation error over this?

This looks like an erratum that should be verified
as correct (because it is), but set aside for fixing
in the next release - i.e. the doc should not
instruct the reader to go to the errata page to
understand the doc.

Stewart


On 28/09/2011 16:37, Acee Lindem wrote:
> Steward, Adrian,
> Approved for state change to verified. This is something I'm going to add to my list of things to check (especially in Bis documents).
> Thanks,
> Acee
> On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:34 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
>
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5250,
>> "The OSPF Opaque LSA Option".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5250&eid=2981
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Gary Cote<gcote@awardsolutions.com>
>>
>> Section: 3
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> Section 7 describes Opaque type allocation and assignment.
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> Section 9 describes Opaque type allocation and assignment.
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> Section 7 was the "IANA Considerations" section in the previous RFC, 2370.
>> IANA Considerations are included in Section 9 of this document.
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC5250 (draft-ietf-ospf-rfc2370bis-05)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : The OSPF Opaque LSA Option
>> Publication Date    : July 2008
>> Author(s)           : L. Berger, I. Bryskin, A. Zinin, R. Coltun
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
>> Area                : Routing
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>


-- 
For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email