Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5250 (2981)

[Acee Lindem <[e-mail]>]

Steward, Adrian, 
Approved for state change to verified. This is something I'm going to add to my list of things to check (especially in Bis documents). 
Thanks,
Acee 
On Sep 28, 2011, at 10:34 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:

> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5250,
> "The OSPF Opaque LSA Option".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5250&eid=2981
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Gary Cote <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 3
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> Section 7 describes Opaque type allocation and assignment.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Section 9 describes Opaque type allocation and assignment.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Section 7 was the "IANA Considerations" section in the previous RFC, 2370.
> IANA Considerations are included in Section 9 of this document.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5250 (draft-ietf-ospf-rfc2370bis-05)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : The OSPF Opaque LSA Option
> Publication Date    : July 2008
> Author(s)           : L. Berger, I. Bryskin, A. Zinin, R. Coltun
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG