[OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5250 (2981)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 28 September 2011 14:31 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFAC821F8D05 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 07:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.478
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.478 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.122, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qJoS5Uf7zsg0 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 07:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615A421F8C9C for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 07:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id C54F198C260; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
To: lberger@labn.net, ibryskin@advaoptical.com, alex.zinin@alcatel-lucent.com, none@rfc-editor.org, stbryant@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, acee.lindem@ericsson.com, akr@cisco.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20110928143401.C54F198C260@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 07:34:01 -0700
Cc: gcote@awardsolutions.com, ospf@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5250 (2981)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 14:31:14 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5250, "The OSPF Opaque LSA Option". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5250&eid=2981 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Gary Cote <gcote@awardsolutions.com> Section: 3 Original Text ------------- Section 7 describes Opaque type allocation and assignment. Corrected Text -------------- Section 9 describes Opaque type allocation and assignment. Notes ----- Section 7 was the "IANA Considerations" section in the previous RFC, 2370. IANA Considerations are included in Section 9 of this document. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC5250 (draft-ietf-ospf-rfc2370bis-05) -------------------------------------- Title : The OSPF Opaque LSA Option Publication Date : July 2008 Author(s) : L. Berger, I. Bryskin, A. Zinin, R. Coltun Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Open Shortest Path First IGP Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5250 (2981) RFC Errata System
- Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5250 (2… Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5250 (2… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [OSPF] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5250 (2… Acee Lindem