Re: Zero as ospfIfRetransInterval

Greg Mirsky <gmirsky@AXIOWAVE.COM> Tue, 24 June 2003 13:27 UTC

Received: from ( []) by (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA15359 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:27:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM ( by (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <>; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 9:27:05 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 46459135 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:27:04 -0400
Received: from by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:27:04 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-ID: <>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 09:27:01 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Greg Mirsky <gmirsky@AXIOWAVE.COM>
Subject: Re: Zero as ospfIfRetransInterval
Precedence: list

I don't think the whole list has to know that ;)

Gregory Mirsky             Axiowave Networks, Inc.
SW Engineer                200 Nickerson Road
Phone: (774)348-4664       Marlborough, MA 01752
Adding manpower to a late SW project makes it later

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Parker [mailto:jparker@AXIOWAVE.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: Zero as ospfIfRetransInterval

You're not allowed to change the syntax unless
it's equivalent to the old syntax. So in this
case, we would need to deprecate/obsolete.

Dan -
        You are such a wet blanket